Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm on and off implementing an fo engine (foxet) and run into fuzziness
with regards to the specs (a bad omen is that that there i could not
find a good manual and the ones i have are made up rather poorly, which
indicated that we're
Hi,
Does anyone have informations about tex macro packages and their
advantages over XSL (previously known as XSL-FO) ?
I have read somewhere that tex is a good implementation of the XSL
standard !
I think this is in regard that tex thinks in matter of boxes (Which is
the equivalent of XSL
Hans Hagen wrote:
Dirar Bougatef wrote:
Does anyone have informations about tex macro packages and their
advantages over XSL (previously known as XSL-FO) ?
I have read somewhere that tex is a good implementation of the XSL
standard !
I think this is in regard that tex thinks in matter of boxes
Dirar Bougatef wrote:
xsl is mostly a specification, and there are program soutthere that
implement parts of is. The page model that xsl uses is not that
advanced. Also, because you more or less make up the page, you also sort
of disable all kind of clever things that batch processors like
