Re: [NTG-context] Displayed formula inside paragraph change vertical space before the paragraph

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 1/16/2017 11:27 PM, Jeong Dal wrote: > >> If I remove either “%” or the formula, then the output looks fine. > > > indeed, some subtle end-par-too-late-then-and-grouping issue > > Hans > >

Re: [NTG-context] Displayed formula inside paragraph change vertical space before the paragraph

On 1/16/2017 11:27 PM, Jeong Dal wrote: If I remove either “%” or the formula, then the output looks fine. indeed, some subtle end-par-too-late-then-and-grouping issue Hans - Hans Hagen

Re: [NTG-context] Displayed formula inside paragraph change vertical space before the paragraph

Dear Mikael, I didn’t see any problem which you mentioned when I run it under the ConTeXt version 2016.10. 6 MKIV beta. But I saw a change the vertical space when I run it under ConTeXt version 2016. 12. 28 MKIV beta after updated the bata. I tested in several ways and found that the vertical

Re: [NTG-context] Displayed formula inside paragraph change vertical space before the paragraph

On 1/16/2017 12:56 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Mikael, Thanks for making it clear to me: I was looking for the changes in vertical spacing around the formula… Now it is clear that there is a bug in the vertical spacing: when I typeset your example with mkii or mkiv ConTeXt Version 2016.05.17

Re: [NTG-context] Displayed formula inside paragraph change vertical space before the paragraph

Hi Mikael, Thanks for making it clear to me: I was looking for the changes in vertical spacing around the formula… Now it is clear that there is a bug in the vertical spacing: when I typeset your example with mkii or mkiv ConTeXt Version 2016.05.17 from TeXLive, the issue is not present, as

Re: [NTG-context] Displayed formula inside paragraph change vertical space before the paragraph

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Otared Kavian wrote: > Hi Mikael, > > To make sure we are talking about the same issue, here are the outputs > obtained with and without blank lines around \startformula…\stopformula: Can > you please send me too your outputs so I can compare

Re: [NTG-context] Displayed formula inside paragraph change vertical space before the paragraph

Hi Mikael, To make sure we are talking about the same issue, here are the outputs obtained with and without blank lines around \startformula…\stopformula: Can you please send me too your outputs so I can compare with mines? Best regards: OK formula-vertical-distance-with.pdf Description:

Re: [NTG-context] Displayed formula inside paragraph change vertical space before the paragraph

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Otared Kavian wrote: >> Hi Mikael, >> >> I tested your example but I see no difference in the outputs, with, or >> without a blank line between the text and the

Re: [NTG-context] Displayed formula inside paragraph change vertical space before the paragraph

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Otared Kavian wrote: > Hi Mikael, > > I tested your example but I see no difference in the outputs, with, or > without a blank line between the text and the displayed formula. > I am using ConteXt 2016.12.28 17:55 MKIV beta. > > Best regards: OK

Re: [NTG-context] Displayed formula inside paragraph change vertical space before the paragraph

Hi Mikael, I tested your example but I see no difference in the outputs, with, or without a blank line between the text and the displayed formula. I am using ConteXt 2016.12.28 17:55 MKIV beta. Best regards: OK > On 13 Jan 2017, at 14:13, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > > Dear

[NTG-context] Displayed formula inside paragraph change vertical space before the paragraph

Dear list, please have a look at the output (ctx-example13.pdf) of the somewhat ugly example below. The vertical space before the paragraph with the displayed formula is almost none. If I remove the % signs before and after the formula, the space before the paragraph looks ok. Do I have to enter

[NTG-context] Displayed formula

Hi folks, I desperately need your help ... why does the following code not produce my formula? \starttext \startformula [-iH(A),-iH(B)]=-iH([A,B]) \stopformula \stoptext I have a feeling that ConTeXt interprets the first part of my formula as an argument to \startformula ... Thanks for

Re: [NTG-context] Displayed formula

2007/7/19, Oliver Buerschaper [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi folks, I desperately need your help ... why does the following code not produce my formula? \starttext \startformula \startformula\relax or \startformula[] [-iH(A),-iH(B)]=-iH([A,B]) \stopformula \stoptext I have a feeling that

Re: [NTG-context] Displayed formula

I desperately need your help ... why does the following code not produce my formula? \starttext \startformula [-iH(A),-iH(B)]=-iH([A,B]) \stopformula \stoptext Hi Olivier, I don't know what ConTeXt is doing behind the scenes, but I found two solutions: \starttext \startformula

Re: [NTG-context] Displayed formula

Wolfgang, Jelle, thanks for your suggestions ... problem solved! Oliver Hi folks, I desperately need your help ... why does the following code not produce my formula? \starttext \startformula \startformula\relax or \startformula[] [-iH(A),-iH(B)]=-iH([A,B]) \stopformula

Re: [NTG-context] Displayed formula

Quoting Oliver Buerschaper [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wolfgang, Jelle, thanks for your suggestions ... problem solved! This thread brings up something that I have been thinking of for a while. Similar problems occur in amsmath aligned family which accepts an optional argument. mathtools.sty has an

Re: [NTG-context] Displayed formula

This thread brings up something that I have been thinking of for a while. Similar problems occur in amsmath aligned family which accepts an optional argument. mathtools.sty has an option so that the optional argument will work only if placed on the same line. In terms of ConTeXt that

Re: [NTG-context] Displayed formula

Quoting Oliver Buerschaper [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This thread brings up something that I have been thinking of for a while. Similar problems occur in amsmath aligned family which accepts an optional argument. mathtools.sty has an option so that the optional argument will work only if placed on

Re: [NTG-context] displayed formula confuses parshape around figure

On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:36:33 +0100 Sanjoy Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It works for me if put a \par or a empty line after the first \input. That's true, but doing so ends the paragraph. Shouldn't the displayed math be part of the paragraph? The \input tufte's were just to make the

Re: [NTG-context] displayed formula confuses parshape around figure

[this bounced before, I think due to disk space being used up on the mailman server. Hopefully you don't get it twice] Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I played yesterday I bit with your example and can you give now a solution for your problem. At first I thought I'd need to

Re: [NTG-context] displayed formula confuses parshape around figure

On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 01:15:35 -0400 Sanjoy Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the following small example, two squares are cut out of the long paragraph. The first is where the external figure belongs and goes, so no problem with that. But the second removed square is after the displayed

Re: [NTG-context] displayed formula confuses parshape around figure

It works for me if put a \par or a empty line after the first \input. That's true, but doing so ends the paragraph. Shouldn't the displayed math be part of the paragraph? The \input tufte's were just to make the minimal example. It came from a paragraph with text and math that begins with a

[NTG-context] displayed formula confuses parshape around figure

In the following small example, two squares are cut out of the long paragraph. The first is where the external figure belongs and goes, so no problem with that. But the second removed square is after the displayed equation, and it shouldn't be removed. If I comment out the formula, then the