Hopefully, this is the correct list for this question. I'm trying to typeset
documents using the font Hoefler on MacOSX (10.8.4) with ConTeXt 2013.05.28
from the TeXlive 2013 distribution. All works, but unfortunately, em dashes
are not typeset correctly; there are three dashes instead of a
On 2013–08–19 Martin Moncrieffe wrote:
Hopefully, this is the correct list for this question. I'm trying
to typeset documents using the font Hoefler on MacOSX (10.8.4)
with ConTeXt 2013.05.28 from the TeXlive 2013 distribution. All
works, but unfortunately, em dashes are not typeset
On 2013–08–20 Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–08–19 Martin Moncrieffe wrote:
Hopefully, this is the correct list for this question. I'm trying
to typeset documents using the font Hoefler on MacOSX (10.8.4)
with ConTeXt 2013.05.28 from the TeXlive 2013 distribution. All
works, but
Am 20.08.2013 um 11:52 schrieb Marco Patzer li...@homerow.info:
On 2013–08–20 Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–08–19 Martin Moncrieffe wrote:
Hopefully, this is the correct list for this question. I'm trying
to typeset documents using the font Hoefler on MacOSX (10.8.4)
with ConTeXt
Hi Marko,
On 20 Aug 2013, at 10:52, Marco Patzer li...@homerow.info wrote:
I checked a different version of the font (1.000) and it works. It
seems you're using a version not containing an em dash.
Thanks for looking into this. Finder reports that my version of Hoefler is
8.0d2e1.
On 2013–08–20 Martin Moncrieffe wrote:
Finder reports that my version of Hoefler is 8.0d2e1.
This means we already have three different Hoefler versions in this
thread.
[…] shows the the em dash is present in the font.
When I use a version with em dash, your example works here. Someone
using
On 8/20/2013 1:02 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 20.08.2013 um 11:52 schrieb Marco Patzer li...@homerow.info:
On 2013–08–20 Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–08–19 Martin Moncrieffe wrote:
Hopefully, this is the correct list for this question. I'm trying
to typeset documents using the font
I don't think it's the font. I have been trying to produce an em dash
using the latest stable release from contextgarden.net, with a couple
of different fonts--Alegreya, which is a free OpenType font, Latin
Modern, and one other that I don't remember. In my case, regardless of
the font, \emdash
Hi Matt,
On 20 Aug 2013, at 13:00, Matt Gushee m...@gushee.net wrote:
I don't think it's the font. I have been trying to produce an em dash
using the latest stable release from contextgarden.net, with a couple
of different fonts--Alegreya, which is a free OpenType font, Latin
Modern, and one
On 8/20/2013 2:07 PM, Martin Moncrieffe wrote:
Hi Matt,
On 20 Aug 2013, at 13:00, Matt Gushee m...@gushee.net
mailto:m...@gushee.net wrote:
I don't think it's the font. I have been trying to produce an em dash
using the latest stable release from contextgarden.net
http://contextgarden.net/,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:00:16PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
great ... another non standard use of names
There are no standard glyph names for TrueType/OpenType fonts. AGL is
completely optional, and is not part of any standard. Fonts can, and do,
use names that does not follow AGL (or no names
11 matches
Mail list logo
