On 8-6-2012 06:16, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 06:14:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
btw, what are features like cv80 and cv81 supposed to represent?
A relatively new OpenType addition.
http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/features_ae.htm#cv01-cv99
ok, so nothing really
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:40:22AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8-6-2012 06:16, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 06:14:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
btw, what are features like cv80 and cv81 supposed to represent?
A relatively new OpenType addition.
Hi, from fontforge users list
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Georg Duffner g.duff...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear fellow fontforgers,
in the last few days I’ve been experimenting with decomposition via
Opentype. I’ve come to some results, but I’m not sure if I’ve done
everything right because no
On 7-6-2012 10:03, luigi scarso wrote:
Hi, from fontforge users list
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Georg Duffnerg.duff...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear fellow fontforgers,
in the last few days I’ve been experimenting with decomposition via
Opentype. I’ve come to some results, but I’m not sure if
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
can you test with
local function s_uncover(splitter,cache,cover)
if cover == then
return nil
else
local uncovered = cache[cover]
if not uncovered then
uncovered =
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 06:14:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
btw, what are features like cv80 and cv81 supposed to represent?
A relatively new OpenType addition.
http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/features_ae.htm#cv01-cv99
Regards,
Khaled
