On Thursday 11 January 2007 13:54, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
How about?
\unprotect
\def\rightdelimitedtextmark
{\delimitedtextparameter\c!right}
\protect
Hi Aditya,
I've run with your patch for a while. It fixes the missing
footnote problem and I haven't noticed it causing any new
Hi Mike,
Mike Bird wrote:
However that was a more complicated test case because it involved
the bib module and cite. Also it referred to problems with
footnotes in vertical mode whereas the new test case includes
the footnote in setupdelimitedtext/right where it appears to be in
Hi Taco,
On Thursday 11 January 2007 01:51, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
https://foundry.supelec.fr/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=63group_id=21
atid=164
That page says:
\setupquotation[right={''\footnote{First}}]
is not usable because it gets fed into \symbol[]
Material is passed through
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Mike Bird wrote:
Hi Taco,
On Thursday 11 January 2007 01:51, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
https://foundry.supelec.fr/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=63group_id=21
atid=164
That page says:
\setupquotation[right={''\footnote{First}}]
is not usable because it gets
Hi Mike,
Can you look through the list archive a bit? There was a
thread begin december last year about the exact same topic.
http://archive.contextgarden.net/
Best, Taco
Mike Bird wrote:
In this example, the first footnote number appears correctly
in the body of the page but the first
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 01:06, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Can you look through the list archive a bit? There was a
thread begin december last year about the exact same topic.
Hi Taco,
I assume you're referring to this thread:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Mike Bird wrote:
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 01:06, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Can you look through the list archive a bit? There was a
thread begin december last year about the exact same topic.
The thread included another possible workaround at:
In this example, the first footnote number appears correctly
in the body of the page but the first footnote is never placed
in the footer. The second footnote is handled correctly.
Therefore the first footnote is not merely deferred but lost.
\starttext
