Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

2016-02-15 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/15/2016 10:29 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Hans Hagen wrote: On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote: I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the | \defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible? i uploaded a beta where you can test: test

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

2016-02-15 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/15/2016 10:31 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Hans Hagen wrote: On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote: I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the | \defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible? i uploaded a beta where you can test: test

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

2016-02-15 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Hans Hagen wrote: On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote: I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the | \defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible? i uploaded a beta where you can test: test {\red\underrandoms{test me}} and \underrandom{test} or

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

2016-02-15 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Hans Hagen wrote: On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote: I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the | \defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible? i uploaded a beta where you can test: test {\red\underrandoms{test me}} and \underrandom{test} or

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

2016-02-15 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/15/2016 9:31 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Hans, Thanks for this new nice feature! However it seems to me that \underdashes produces dots under ords, while \underdots produces dashes… Is it on purpose? no, will be fixed in next beta Also the name \underrandoms seems misleading too. i

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

2016-02-15 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Hans, Thanks for this new nice feature! However it seems to me that \underdashes produces dots under ords, while \underdots produces dashes… Is it on purpose? Also the name \underrandoms seems misleading too. Best regards: OK > On 15 Feb 2016, at 10:39, Hans Hagen wrote:

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

2016-02-15 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote: I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the |\defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible? i uploaded a beta where you can test: test {\red\underrandoms{test me}} and \underrandom{test} or \underrandom{grep} \blank test

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

2016-02-13 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote: I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the |\defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible? not yet (but one can use inline text backgrounds to achieve this) i'm playing with some extensions to the underbar code but it might take a

[NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

2016-02-11 Thread Laurent d'Airsy
I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the \defineunderbarmechanism. Is that possible? ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist :