Re: [NTG-context] Is there a mathematica typesetting manual for ConTeXt ?

2005-05-18 Thread Mojca Miklavec
I'm affraid I'm too late already, but I'm sending this anyway. The lines you sent as an example have two pecculiarities: - bad alignment - too short arrows I managed to solve the first problem -- alignment (with some cheating, using TeXBOOK), but I have no idea how to extend \downharpoonright for

Re: [NTG-context] Is there a mathematica typesetting manual for ConTeXt ?

2005-05-14 Thread Adam Lindsay
Tobias Burnus said this at Sat, 14 May 2005 07:05:44 +0200: (I have to admit, I cannot find m-math.tex/t-math.tex anywhere.) I assumed Hans meant MathML. :) \usemodule[mathml] The basic math capabilities within ConTeXt do seem poorly documented, mostly because they point to different sources,

Re: Re: [NTG-context] Is there a mathematica typesetting manual for ConTeXt ?

2005-05-14 Thread xiaojf
Hi,Adam Lindsay, === 2005-05-14 08:46:00 You wrote=== Tobias Burnus said this at Sat, 14 May 2005 07:05:44 +0200: (I have to admit, I cannot find m-math.tex/t-math.tex anywhere.) I assumed Hans meant MathML. :) \usemodule[mathml] The basic math capabilities within ConTeXt

Re: [NTG-context] Is there a mathematica typesetting manual for ConTeXt ?

2005-05-14 Thread Adam Lindsay
xiaojf said this at Sat, 14 May 2005 19:49:02 +0800: The double-, triple-, and quadruple-integrals (\nt) are undefined in basic ConTeXt's math. I must say thank you very very much! In fact I've been looking for \iint in ConTeXt in the last two days -_- so i'll try to use \int\!\!\!\int

Re: Re: [NTG-context] Is there a mathematica typesetting manual for ConTeXt ?

2005-05-14 Thread xiaojf
=== 2005-05-14 13:31:00 You worte=== xiaojf said this at Sat, 14 May 2005 19:49:02 +0800: The double-, triple-, and quadruple-integrals (\nt) are undefined in basic ConTeXt's math. I must say thank you very very much! In fact I've been looking for \iint in ConTeXt in the last two

Re: [NTG-context] Is there a mathematica typesetting manual for ConTeXt ?

2005-05-13 Thread Hans Hagen
redox wrote: Hi, Mikael, Thanks for your kindness, and sorry for my bad English ^_^ I mean I want to type some math formulas with ConTeXt. Since i don't know too much about ConTeXt/TeX, i want to find a manual about this subject and to learn by myself. In the ConTeXt an excursion(page

Re: [NTG-context] Is there a mathematica typesetting manual for ConTeXt ?

2005-05-13 Thread Maurice Diamantini
Le 13 mai 05 à 05:18, redox a écrit : I mean I want to type some math formulas with ConTeXt. Since i don't know too much about ConTeXt/TeX, i want to find a manual about this subject and to learn by myself. In the ConTeXt an excursion(page 15), it says, We advise you to do some further reading on

Re: [NTG-context] Is there a mathematica typesetting manual for ConTeXt ?

2005-05-13 Thread redox
Hans Hagen wrote: redox wrote: Hi, Mikael, Thanks for your kindness, and sorry for my bad English ^_^ I mean I want to type some math formulas with ConTeXt. Since i don't know too much about ConTeXt/TeX, i want to find a manual about this subject and to learn by myself. In the ConTeXt an

Re: [NTG-context] Is there a mathematica typesetting manual for ConTeXt ?

2005-05-13 Thread Tobias Burnus
Ni hao and hello, redox wrote: \usemodule[math] or \usemodule[newmat] or \usemodule[nath] For most equation, the plain TeX commands incl. \eqalign and \eqalignno should be enough. (For the latter: \formulanumber{} and \formulasubnumber are useful.) For nath, one should use the LaTeX

[NTG-context] Is there a mathematica typesetting manual for ConTeXt ?

2005-05-12 Thread redox
hi all, I am a newbie of ConTeXt, i'm sorry if my question is foolish. I have two questions: 1. Is there a mathematica typesetting manual for ConTeXt ? There seems no ConTeXt manual focused on mathematica. Or I just need to find a mathematica manual for LaTeX ? 2. I'm running TeTeX 2.0.2 on

Re: [NTG-context] Is there a mathematica typesetting manual for ConTeXt ?

2005-05-12 Thread Hans Hagen
redox wrote: hi all, I am a newbie of ConTeXt, i'm sorry if my question is foolish. I have two questions: 1. Is there a mathematica typesetting manual for ConTeXt ? There seems no ConTeXt manual focused on mathematica. Or I just need to find a mathematica manual for LaTeX ? 2. I'm

Re: [NTG-context] Is there a mathematica typesetting manual for ConTeXt ?

2005-05-12 Thread Mikael Persson
On 5/12/05, redox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi all, I am a newbie of ConTeXt, i'm sorry if my question is foolish. I have two questions: 1. Is there a mathematica typesetting manual for ConTeXt ? There seems no ConTeXt manual focused on mathematica. Or I just need to find a mathematica

Re: [NTG-context] Is there a mathematica typesetting manual for ConTeXt ?

2005-05-12 Thread redox
Hi, Mikael, Thanks for your kindness, and sorry for my bad English ^_^ I mean I want to type some math formulas with ConTeXt. Since i don't know too much about ConTeXt/TeX, i want to find a manual about this subject and to learn by myself. In the ConTeXt an excursion(page 15), it says, We