On 1/29/2013 12:20 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:33:52PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The \frac command uses \vcenter for the content while \dfrac and
\tfrac only set the mathstyle before placing the content with the
\over primitive.
The use of \vcenter seems odd here
Indeed it seems like the alignment is good with \dfrac, but this does
not solve my problem, since I wish to also use fractions with
script-size or scriptscript-size (\xfrac, \xxfrac). The specific
formula I have is
\startformula
f_{B_t | B_s = S, B_u = U}(x) = \frac{e^{-\frac{(u-s)x^2 - 2x(S(u-t)
Le 28 janv. 13 à 10:11, Janne Junnila a écrit :
Indeed it seems like the alignment is good with \dfrac, but this does
not solve my problem, since I wish to also use fractions with
script-size or scriptscript-size (\xfrac, \xxfrac). The specific
formula I have is
\startformula
f_{B_t | B_s =
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Roland Thiers wrote:
Le 28 janv. 13 à 10:11, Janne Junnila a écrit :
Indeed it seems like the alignment is good with \dfrac, but this does
not solve my problem, since I wish to also use fractions with
script-size or scriptscript-size (\xfrac, \xxfrac). The specific
Am 28.01.2013 um 20:41 schrieb Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Roland Thiers wrote:
Le 28 janv. 13 à 10:11, Janne Junnila a écrit :
Indeed it seems like the alignment is good with \dfrac, but this does
not solve my problem, since I wish to also use fractions with
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
I'll look into fractions later this week. All the fraction macros of ConTeXt
were based on \genfrac macro from AMSTeX so, in principle, they should behave
in the same manner.
The \frac command uses \vcenter for the content while \dfrac and
Hi Janne,
Personnally I prefer to use the Plain TeX alternative \over (which works fine
in ConTeXt), that is
${a \over b}$
instead of
$\frac{a}{b}$
Compare the following two outputs in the example you want to typeset: I think
the second is more or less what you want
\starttext
Am 28.01.2013 um 21:48 schrieb Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
I'll look into fractions later this week. All the fraction macros of
ConTeXt were based on \genfrac macro from AMSTeX so, in principle, they
should behave in the same manner.
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Janne,
Personnally I prefer to use the Plain TeX alternative \over (which works fine
in ConTeXt), that is
${a \over b}$
instead of
$\frac{a}{b}$
Compare the following two outputs in the example you want to typeset: I think
the
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:33:52PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The \frac command uses \vcenter for the content while \dfrac and
\tfrac only set the mathstyle before placing the content with the
\over primitive.
The use of \vcenter seems odd here as it means the fraction rule will no
Hi all,
I've run into a couple of problems with math typesetting. (I'm using the
latest ConTeXt standalone beta.) The following doesn't print [x,x] at all:
\startformula
[x,x]_t = x
\stopformula
It can be fixed by using \left[x,x\right]_t, but I find the behaviour weird.
Another problem I have
Hi Janne,
Janne wrote:
I've run into a couple of problems with math typesetting. (I'm using the
latest ConTeXt standalone beta.) The following doesn't print [x,x] at all:
\startformula
[x,x]_t = x
\stopformula
This is because \startformula can take one optional argument in square
brackets,
Hi Sietse,
Sietse wrote:
This is because \startformula can take one optional argument in square
brackets, and [x,x] is interpreted as that argument. You can make
\startformula stop looking for [...] either by telling it to `\relax`,
or by giving it an empty `[]` of its own to chew on.
Thanks
On Jan 27, 2013, at 7:09 AM, Sietse Brouwer sbbrou...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is because \startformula can take one optional argument in square
brackets, and [x,x] is interpreted as that argument. You can make
\startformula stop looking for [...] either by telling it to `\relax`,
or by giving
Le 27 janv. 13 à 12:52, Janne Junnila a écrit :
Hi all,
Another problem I have is related to the positioning of minus signs
in front of fractions. I would expect the minus sign to align with
the horizontal line of the fraction, as it does on LaTeX. Below is
an example formula to
15 matches
Mail list logo
