Re: [NTG-context] Printer requires vectorised contour path for cut contour

2018-09-11 Thread Hans Hagen
On 9/11/2018 5:28 PM, Alan Braslau wrote: Hi Marco, In Metapost, fill is: def fill expr c = addto currentpicture contour c _op_ enddef ; (whereas draw adds a "doublepath".) the double in doublepath always puzzles me Hans

Re: [NTG-context] Printer requires vectorised contour path for cut contour

2018-09-11 Thread Alan Braslau
Hi Marco, In Metapost, fill is: def fill expr c = addto currentpicture contour c _op_ enddef ; (whereas draw adds a "doublepath".) Alan On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 12:49:04 +0200 Marco Patzer wrote: > Hi! > > I created a non-rectangular shaped document. The printer requires a cut > contour in

Re: [NTG-context] Printer requires vectorised contour path for cut contour

2018-09-10 Thread Marco Patzer
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 17:00:38 +0200 Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > > I created a non-rectangular shaped document. The printer requires a > > cut contour in a particular colour, no problem so far. However, he > > complained about a missing “single continuous closed vectorised > > contour path”. The one

Re: [NTG-context] Printer requires vectorised contour path for cut contour

2018-09-06 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Marco Patzer schrieb am 06.09.18 um 12:49: Hi! I created a non-rectangular shaped document. The printer requires a cut contour in a particular colour, no problem so far. However, he complained about a missing “single continuous closed vectorised contour path”. The one I provided is an area, not

[NTG-context] Printer requires vectorised contour path for cut contour

2018-09-06 Thread Marco Patzer
Hi! I created a non-rectangular shaped document. The printer requires a cut contour in a particular colour, no problem so far. However, he complained about a missing “single continuous closed vectorised contour path”. The one I provided is an area, not a contour path. I created the path as