Den tis 30 jan. 2024 09:06Henning Hraban Ramm skrev:
> Am 29.01.24 um 21:45 schrieb jbf:
> > And indeed this is the best solution I could find, though it obviously
> > meant that something like '29 April 2017' was no good for sorting on...
> > it has to be the US date format YY-MM-DD
>
> How did
Am 29.01.24 um 21:45 schrieb jbf:
And indeed this is the best solution I could find, though it obviously
meant that something like '29 April 2017' was no good for sorting on...
it has to be the US date format YY-MM-DD
How did you expect a simple sorting algorithm to sort by verbose dates?
And indeed this is the best solution I could find, though it obviously
meant that something like '29 April 2017' was no good for sorting on...
it has to be the US date format YY-MM-DD
Julian
On 30/1/24 06:15, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Henning Hraban Ramm schrieb am 27.01.2024 um 10:05:
Am
On 29 Jan 2024, at 19:15, Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
>
> Henning Hraban Ramm schrieb am 27.01.2024 um 10:05:
>> Am 26.01.24 um 23:46 schrieb jbf:
>>> I wonder if someone can point me in the right direction for a separate TOC
>>> which needs to be in chronological order at the back of the book
Henning Hraban Ramm schrieb am 27.01.2024 um 10:05:
Am 26.01.24 um 23:46 schrieb jbf:
I wonder if someone can point me in the right direction for a separate
TOC which needs to be in chronological order at the back of the book
(i.e. not in page number order, although I need the page numbers to
Am 26.01.24 um 23:46 schrieb jbf:
I wonder if someone can point me in the right direction for a separate
TOC which needs to be in chronological order at the back of the book
(i.e. not in page number order, although I need the page numbers to show
up in the TOC. There is the normal TOC at the
