On Dec 15, 2004, at 12:16 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
that was from the time that i played with schema's, nowadays i prefer
relax ng
Indeed!
It may be worth noting that the next generation versions of both
DocBook and TEI:
- are developed in RELAX NG
- are namespaced
- are designed for
Adam Lindsay wrote:
h h extern said this at Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:38:27 +0100:
Also, what's the status of contml? I like the idea of it as a simple,
structural, basic markup that ConTeXt handles with zero effort, but is
anyone actually using it?
we sometimes mix it into other xml docs; i have no
Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
BTW, Hans, I've yet to see the ContML schema. Care to post it somewhere?
that was from the time that i played with schema's, nowadays i prefer relax
ng
the funny ?context-block ? things can be used by some modules (in the
distribution) to filter definitions for
On Dec 13, 2004, at 1:02 PM, Adam Lindsay wrote:
What I propose is clearly a debatable XML-design issue, but it seemed
strange that fx:definelayout and fx:p were put into the same namespace.
Why do the formatting definitions share the same (theoretical) schema
as
markup? Your documents keep these
