Re: [NTG-context] Reconciling unicode-math with LaTeX2e mathematics

2015-12-03 Thread Hans Hagen
On 12/3/2015 3:16 AM, Maggyero wrote: In both LaTeX and ConTeXt, we have two kinds of fonts: — a text font: multi-letter words; — a math font: single letter words. In math mode, using LaTeX, text fonts can use both — text spacing: $\textit{abc ffi}$ gives abc ffi; — math spacing: $\mathit{abc

[NTG-context] Reconciling unicode-math with LaTeX2e mathematics

2015-12-02 Thread Maggyero
Hans Hagen wrote: > you need to be more explicit about the problems you encounter (minimal examples for instance) To be more precise (please see the enclosed P.D.F. file), I would like the same font possibilities in ConTeXt math mode as shown in the following table from Will Robertson's talk at

Re: [NTG-context] Reconciling unicode-math with LaTeX2e mathematics

2015-12-02 Thread Maggyero
Hans Hagen wrote: > you need to be more explicit about the problems you encounter (minimal examples for instance) To be more precise (please see the enclosed P.D.F. file), I would like the same font possibilities in ConTeXt math mode as shown in the following table from Will Robertson's talk at

[NTG-context] Reconciling unicode-math with LaTeX2e mathematics

2015-11-30 Thread Maggyero
Is there a plan to have in ConTeXt the same kind of math behavior that Will Robertson implemented in the last version of his unicode-math LaTeX package (\mathrm, \mathit, \mathbf, \symrm, \symit, \symbf, etc.)? Because ConTeXt currently has the same math/text spacing issues in math mode that the

Re: [NTG-context] Reconciling unicode-math with LaTeX2e mathematics

2015-11-30 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11/30/2015 6:20 PM, Maggyero wrote: Is there a plan to have in ConTeXt the same kind of math behavior that Will Robertson implemented in the last version of his unicode-math LaTeX package (\mathrm, \mathit, \mathbf, \symrm, \symit, \symbf, etc.)? Because ConTeXt currently has the same