Re: [NTG-context] Reproducible PDF output not working

2018-04-24 Thread N. Raghavendra
At 2018-04-24T10:03:16+02:00, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: >> PS: Incidentally, what is the "-19:00" in date in the first identifier? >> In my time zone, IST, I would have expected 2018-04-24T01:49:47+05:30. > > I remember noticing something strange in the date format when files > were compiled after

Re: [NTG-context] Reproducible PDF output not working

2018-04-24 Thread N. Raghavendra
At 2018-04-24T09:44:09+02:00, Hans Hagen wrote: > fixed in beta but no beta soon ... in lpdf-ini.lua you can try to fix > this Thank you for the solution. Raghu. -- N. Raghavendra , http://www.retrotexts.net/ Harish-Chandra Research Institute, http://www.hri.res.in/

Re: [NTG-context] Reproducible PDF output not working

2018-04-24 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
> On the other hand, with the 2017.11.14 version, the identifier in the > output of `context --nodates' is just > > foo The longer identifier is definitely better, but it should be possible to make it predictable over successive runs. > PS: Incidentally, what is the "-19:00" in date in the

Re: [NTG-context] Reproducible PDF output not working

2018-04-24 Thread Hans Hagen
On 4/24/2018 6:28 AM, N. Raghavendra wrote: At 2018-04-23T23:49:19+02:00, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: it seems the identifier uses the time of compilation, when it should probably use the time of last modification of the source file. Yes, with the 2018.04.19 version, the identifier in the

Re: [NTG-context] Reproducible PDF output not working

2018-04-23 Thread N. Raghavendra
At 2018-04-23T23:49:19+02:00, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: > it seems the identifier uses the time of compilation, when it should > probably use the time of last modification of the source file. Yes, with the 2018.04.19 version, the identifier in the output of `context --nodates' includes the

Re: [NTG-context] Reproducible PDF output not working

2018-04-23 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
Hi Raghu, I can reproduce the problem you observe. Hans, it seems the identifier uses the time of compilation, when it should probably use the time of last modification of the source file. Best, Arthur

[NTG-context] Reproducible PDF output not working

2018-04-23 Thread N. Raghavendra
Sometime ago, I asked here about reproducible PDF output, and was told about the --nodates option of context. It worked then, but doesn't seem to be working now, with a recent version of context. -- $ cat foo.tex \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] Reproducible PDF output

2017-11-12 Thread Alan Braslau
On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 09:37:33 +0100 Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > Am 2017-11-11 um 21:06 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez : > > > I always use contextjit instead of context, because it’s faster. > > > > Other than speed, I think there is no other difference. > > Sometimes

Re: [NTG-context] Reproducible PDF output

2017-11-12 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 2017-11-11 um 21:06 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez : > I always use contextjit instead of context, because it’s faster. > > Other than speed, I think there is no other difference. Sometimes it has its own bugs, like at the moment (at least in last week’s beta) with Lua code.

Re: [NTG-context] Reproducible PDF output

2017-11-11 Thread N. Raghavendra
At 2017-11-11T21:06:22+01:00, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > I checked it with sha256sum ;-). And, why not! > I always use contextjit instead of context, because it’s faster. > > Other than speed, I think there is no other difference. That's good to know. I'll try it out. Regards, Raghu. -- N.

Re: [NTG-context] Reproducible PDF output

2017-11-11 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 11/11/2017 08:08 PM, N. Raghavendra wrote: [...] > $ ( context --nodates example.tex && cp example.pdf a && sleep 1 && \ > context --nodates example.tex && cp example.pdf b ) > /dev/null && \ > md5sum a b I checked it with sha256sum ;-). > Incidentally, is it common to use the

Re: [NTG-context] Reproducible PDF output

2017-11-11 Thread N. Raghavendra
At 2017-11-11T14:37:33+01:00, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > "contextjit --nodates" is your friend here. > > No \pdf* commands are required. > > I hope it helps, Dear Pablo, Thanks for the answer. It works. -- $ cat example.tex

Re: [NTG-context] Reproducible PDF output

2017-11-11 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 11/11/2017 08:39 AM, N. Raghavendra wrote: > I would like to have reproducible PDF output from ConTeXt documents. I > tried the suggestions at https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/313605/146025 > but they did not work. The PDF output has information like > "ConTeXt.Time", "CreateDate", etc., which

[NTG-context] Reproducible PDF output

2017-11-10 Thread N. Raghavendra
I would like to have reproducible PDF output from ConTeXt documents. I tried the suggestions at https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/313605/146025 but they did not work. The PDF output has information like "ConTeXt.Time", "CreateDate", etc., which depend on the time the source was processed at. How