Re: [NTG-context] Reviewing old messages

Meer, Hans van der 16. Mai 2016 um 17:18 Ok. But when using "strut=no,autostrut=no" I see for all values of align the abc/xyz below each other and none having abcxyz. Doesn't that suggest that all boxes are vbox and that the strut merely forces horizontal mode?

Re: [NTG-context] Reviewing old messages

On 16 May 2016, at 16:41, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: Meer, Hans van der 16. Mai 2016 um 16:31 Thanks. I redid the examples with the autostrut parameter set to respectively yes and no. In the former

Re: [NTG-context] Reviewing old messages

Meer, Hans van der 16. Mai 2016 um 16:31 Thanks. I redid the examples with the autostrut parameter set to respectively yes and no. In the former case I see all have an hbox and in the latter case all have a vbox. So it seems not the align, but the strut being the

Re: [NTG-context] Reviewing old messages

Thanks. I redid the examples with the autostrut parameter set to respectively yes and no. In the former case I see all have an hbox and in the latter case all have a vbox. So it seems not the align, but the strut being the one determining the box variant. Hans van der Meer On 16 May 2016,

Re: [NTG-context] Reviewing old messages

Meer, Hans van der 16. Mai 2016 um 15:50 Sifting through my TeX-mailbox, I came along this post of Wolfgang Schuster and decided to try all variations given to the align parameter on \framed. Curious in which cases the \hbox and in which the \vbox is chosen, not

[NTG-context] Reviewing old messages

Sifting through my TeX-mailbox, I came along this post of Wolfgang Schuster and decided to try all variations given to the align parameter on \framed. Curious in which cases the \hbox and in which the \vbox is chosen, not unimportant of course. I did this by typesetting \hbox{abc}\hbox{xyz}