Alan Braslau schrieb am 19.07.2019 um 16:06:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:52:37 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Henri Menke schrieb am 18.07.2019 um 23:29:
For what it's worth, the MKIV way to switch to bold face is
\bold{text} instead of {\bf text} but it also doesn't fix your
problem because
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:52:37 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> Henri Menke schrieb am 18.07.2019 um 23:29:
> > For what it's worth, the MKIV way to switch to bold face is
> > \bold{text} instead of {\bf text} but it also doesn't fix your
> > problem because neither of the two start a new
Henri Menke schrieb am 18.07.2019 um 23:29:
For what it's worth, the MKIV way to switch to bold face is \bold{text}
instead of {\bf text} but it also doesn't fix your problem because
neither of the two start a new paragraph before the first letter and
therefore \the\everypar is still inside a
On 19/07/19 9:36 AM, Duncan Hothersall wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 at 22:30, Henri Menke wrote:
>
>>
>> Your formatting obscures the problem because compiling this example
>> works fine. I think you are starting a new paragraph before {\bf ...}.
>> That is a well-known problem and there are
On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 at 22:30, Henri Menke wrote:
>
> Your formatting obscures the problem because compiling this example
> works fine. I think you are starting a new paragraph before {\bf ...}.
> That is a well-known problem and there are posts about it on the mailing
> list every once in a
On 19/07/19 3:18 AM, Duncan Hothersall wrote:
> I think I have identified a bug in the side figure mechanism which is
> demonstrated by the minimal example below. The {\bf …} construct causes the
> para in which it appears to stop behaving properly with the side figure, and
> the text
I think I have identified a bug in the side figure mechanism which is
demonstrated by the minimal example below. The {\bf …} construct causes the
para in which it appears to stop behaving properly with the side figure,
and the text overflows. The preceding and following paras which don't have
{\bf
