On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:11:53 +0100
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 11 Feb 2019, at 07:43, Hans Hagen wrote:
> >
> >
> >> The wiki should reflect that, at least the old repo information
> >> (foundry.supelec.fr) should go. The manual can stay. But before
> >> removing the info on the
Hi,
> On 11 Feb 2019, at 07:43, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>
>> The wiki should reflect that, at least the old repo information
>> (foundry.supelec.fr) should go. The manual can stay. But before
>> removing the info on the wiki someone needs to confirm there's no
>> repo any longer.
Yes, the repo is
On 2/10/2019 8:13 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 17:43:09 +0100
Hans Hagen wrote:
that effort was changed in cooking up smaller independent manuals ...
Which I personally like. It provides more in depth knowledge.
that ref manual still applies to much (encodings and fonts
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 17:43:09 +0100
Hans Hagen wrote:
> that effort was changed in cooking up smaller independent manuals ...
Which I personally like. It provides more in depth knowledge.
> that ref manual still applies to much (encodings and fonts have
> changed of course)
I know about the
On 2/10/2019 2:00 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
Hi!
I'm wondering about the state of the reference manual
contextref.pdf. The wiki states
“ConTeXt reference manual. This is the most comprehensive and
up-to-date general manual[…]” Date: September 27, 2013
There used to be SVN access on
Hi!
I'm wondering about the state of the reference manual
contextref.pdf. The wiki states
“ConTeXt reference manual. This is the most comprehensive and
up-to-date general manual[…]” Date: September 27, 2013
There used to be SVN access on
foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextman, but
