Thanks Taco!
I understand much better now. I think it's best to leave the units out
until the drawing stage as you suggest.
Thanks again
Keith McKay
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020, 08:30 Taco Hoekwater, wrote:
>
>
> > On 26 Nov 2020, at 16:09, Keith McKay wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been using
> On 26 Nov 2020, at 16:09, Keith McKay wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been using xpart and ypart to extract these values from pairs of
> points in a path but I wasn't getting the correct result. I was expecting:
>
> pair (2cm, 11cm) to give xpart 2 and ypart 11
As explained by various people,
/First « //uniformdeviate(1) - 0.5// » could be modified to «
//uniformdeviate(0.5)//»./
/
/
/To add noise, you can use the randomized function of Metafun. For
exemple, you can write:/
/
/
/draw pp randomized 1cm ;/
/
/
That's true Fabrice but in this use case I wanted a random number
between
Thanks again Hans and Fabrice, for the time you have both taken with my
question and thanks for the code snippet Hans. Just one last
confirmation from the snippet. Hans uses the correction factor cf on the
x and yparts of a[i]. I taking this as meaning that this has to be done
because the x
Keith,
> Le 26 nov. 2020 à 12:12, Keith McKay a écrit :
> Thanks Fabrice and Hans.
>
> I now see I can simplify some lines of the code:
>
> pp := ((xpart a[i])/cf*cm, (ypart a[i])/cf*cm); now becomes pp:= a[i];
>
> and
>
> pp := pp --- ((xpart a[i+1]/cf)*cm, (ypart a[i+1])/cf*cm); now
On 11/26/2020 6:12 PM, Keith McKay wrote:
Thanks Fabrice and Hans.
I now see I can simplify some lines of the code:
pp := ((xpart a[i])/cf*cm, (ypart a[i])/cf*cm); now becomes pp:= a[i];
and
pp := pp --- ((xpart a[i+1]/cf)*cm, (ypart a[i+1])/cf*cm); now becomes
pp := pp --- a[i +1] ;
Thanks Fabrice and Hans.
I now see I can simplify some lines of the code:
pp := ((xpart a[i])/cf*cm, (ypart a[i])/cf*cm); now becomes pp:= a[i];
and
pp := pp --- ((xpart a[i+1]/cf)*cm, (ypart a[i+1])/cf*cm); now becomes
pp := pp --- a[i +1] ;
However I still have the problem in the
On 11/26/2020 4:09 PM, Keith McKay wrote:
Hi,
I have been using xpart and ypart to extract these values from pairs of
points in a path but I wasn't getting the correct result. I was expecting:
pair (2cm, 11cm) to give xpart 2 and ypart 11
However I was getting:
pair (2cm, 11cm) -> xpart
Hi keith,
> Le 26 nov. 2020 à 10:09, Keith McKay a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been using xpart and ypart to extract these values from pairs of
> points in a path but I wasn't getting the correct result. I was expecting:
>
> pair (2cm, 11cm) to give xpart 2 and ypart 11
>
> However I was
Hi,
I have been using xpart and ypart to extract these values from pairs of
points in a path but I wasn't getting the correct result. I was expecting:
pair (2cm, 11cm) to give xpart 2 and ypart 11
However I was getting:
pair (2cm, 11cm) -> xpart 56.6929 and ypart 311.8096
After much head
10 matches
Mail list logo
