Hi Hans,
Thanks for your attention which fixed most of the difficulties with vertical
distances around math formulas.
However, after typesetting a long document, I noticed that there are still some
incorrect behaviours. The following minimal example, extracted from that long
document, shows
On 1/18/2017 6:23 PM, Nicola wrote:
On 18/01/2017 17:53, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Nicola,
In fact, if you are in a hurry and don’t use subtle things
introduced since May 2016, you can use the stable version of ConTeXt
from TeXLive
2016 (the bug noticed by Mikael, and you, is absent from that
On 18/01/2017 17:53, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Nicola,
In fact, if you are in a hurry and don’t use subtle things
introduced since May 2016, you can use the stable version of ConTeXt from
TeXLive
2016 (the bug noticed by Mikael, and you, is absent from that version of
ConTeXt).
Thanks,
Hi Nicola,
In fact, if you are in a hurry and don’t use subtle things introduced since May
2016, you can use the stable version of ConTeXt from TeXLive 2016 (the bug
noticed by Mikael, and you, is absent from that version of ConTeXt).
Best regards: OK
> On 18 Jan 2017, at 17:26, Nicola
On 18/01/2017 16:53, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Nicola,
Indeed there is a recent bug, reported by Mikael Sundqvist a few days ago, and
Hans is aware of this.
Hans said in the next release of ConTeXt beta the issue will be fixed.
Sorry, I hadn't noticed the other thread. I'll wait for the next
Hi Nicola,
Indeed there is a recent bug, reported by Mikael Sundqvist a few days ago, and
Hans is aware of this.
Hans said in the next release of ConTeXt beta the issue will be fixed.
Best regards: OK
> On 18 Jan 2017, at 16:00, Nicola wrote:
>
> Hello,
> has
Hello,
has something been changed in the last few months in the vertical
spacing of displayed formulas, frames or other environments?
I am re-typesetting some presentations using the latest beta and the
content of slides (especially those containing formulas) now tends to
flow to the next page,