Hi Pepe,
If you want your content to remain maintainable and manageable for a
long period (e.g. decades), if you can afford it, and if you have a
sufficiently large amount of content, then I strongly recommend
investing the time and effort in an XML-based solution.
My experience is in large
On Jun 11, 2007, at 5:49 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Some of the difficulties that I faced with simple documents was:
1. What is the xml equivalent of ||
2. What is the xml equivalent of ~ (nbsp; ??)
3. What is the xml equivalent of
\abbreviation {EECS} {Electrical Engineering and Computer
On Sunday 10 June 2007 23:49, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Pepe Barbe wrote:
Hello,
I have used ConTeXt in the past and I have been very pleased with
it and the results obtained, much more than LaTeX.
Now I am looking into a solution that would allow me to layout
the
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Jun 11, 2007, at 5:49 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Some of the difficulties that I faced with simple documents was:
1. What is the xml equivalent of ||
2. What is the xml equivalent of ~ (nbsp; ??)
3. What is the xml equivalent of
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, John R. Culleton wrote:
On Sunday 10 June 2007 23:49, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Pepe Barbe wrote:
Hello,
I have used ConTeXt in the past and I have been very pleased with
it and the results obtained, much more than LaTeX.
Now I am looking into a
2007/6/11, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hmm... somehome I had missed xtag-ent.tex. I was looking at xml
introductions, and did not look into ConTeXt sources. I will have a
look and see how it goes.
Thanks,
Aditya
Hi Aditya,
the XML-Document example.pdf is a little bit outdated (Hans
Quoting Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/6/11, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hmm... somehome I had missed xtag-ent.tex. I was looking at xml
introductions, and did not look into ConTeXt sources. I will have a
look and see how it goes.
Thanks,
Aditya
Hi Aditya,
the
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:42:23 -0400, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks. I had not looked at them and some of the things about handling
at the ConTeXt end are more clear now. But I think that I did not
explain my question correctly.
What I do not understand how are abbreviations
Hello,
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:31:45 -0500, Pepe Barbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have used ConTeXt in the past and I have been very pleased with it
and the results obtained, much more than LaTeX.
Now I am looking into a solution that would allow me to layout the
content ConTeXt and in other
Quoting nico [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:42:23 -0400, Aditya Mahajan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I had not looked at them and some of the things about handling
at the ConTeXt end are more clear now. But I think that I did not
explain my question correctly.
What I do
Hello,
I have used ConTeXt in the past and I have been very pleased with it
and the results obtained, much more than LaTeX.
Now I am looking into a solution that would allow me to layout the
content ConTeXt and in other formats that ConTeXt does not (Forgive my
ignorance, if I am wrong) output,
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Pepe Barbe wrote:
Hello,
I have used ConTeXt in the past and I have been very pleased with it
and the results obtained, much more than LaTeX.
Now I am looking into a solution that would allow me to layout the
content ConTeXt and in other formats that ConTeXt does not
On 6/11/07, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reading the Wiki one of those solutions would be XML,
try
tbookdtd.sf.net
myabe can help you.
--
luigi
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
to
13 matches
Mail list logo