Re: [NTG-context] bib: potential range of bibliography styles?

2005-03-25 Thread David Wooten
Great, that does the trick. Another quickie: This bib style demands that the first author/editor is invertedauthor, while the subsequent authors/editors are normalauthor, e.g.: WOOTEN, David and Charles M. SCHULZ and Kris KRINGLE. 2005. Adventures in Babysitting, etc. Is there currently the

Re: [NTG-context] bib: potential range of bibliography styles?

2005-03-24 Thread David Wooten
Hm. A quick questionis there a way to call all true upper case (instead of {\sc small caps})? I haven't been able to track this down in the usual places. For myself the small caps are preferable, but they're not officially sanctioned :). Regards, David On Mar 23, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Taco

Re: [NTG-context] bib: potential range of bibliography styles?

2005-03-24 Thread Taco Hoekwater
David Wooten wrote: Hm. A quick questionis there a way to call all true upper case (instead of {\sc small caps})? I haven't been able to track this down in the usual places. For myself the small caps are preferable, but they're not officially sanctioned :). I have to guess a bit on what the

[NTG-context] bib: potential range of bibliography styles?

2005-03-23 Thread dw
Greetings all, I'm leaning towards experimenting with the bib module to see if I can arrive at a usable Semiotics Society of America reference section, which is a historically layered style, along the lines of: --- PEIRCE, Charles S. 1859. An Essay on the Limits of Religious Thought Written to

Re: [NTG-context] bib: potential range of bibliography styles?

2005-03-23 Thread Taco Hoekwater
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aside from all the niggling details (which I'm sure could be worked out), is this kind of layout in general possibleall citations going by year underneath a single instance of the author? or am I doomed to forever make these by hand? ;) I'd say it is doable, but not

Re: [NTG-context] bib: potential range of bibliography styles?

2005-03-23 Thread dw
Excellent, I'll take it up soon! Regards, David On Mar 23, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aside from all the niggling details (which I'm sure could be worked out), is this kind of layout in general possibleall citations going by year underneath a single