Re: [NTG-context] header entries semi-wrong

2011-03-10 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 06.03.2011 um 11:56 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: --on page 1 there is section 1.1 one and you get the header entry 1.1 one - on page 3 there is still section 1.1 one and you get the header entry 1.2 one (- ?!) - on page 5 there is section 1.2 two and you get the header entry 1.2 two

Re: [NTG-context] header entries semi-wrong

2011-03-10 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de wrote: Am 06.03.2011 um 11:56 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: --on page 1 there is section 1.1 one and you get the header entry 1.1 one - on page 3 there is still section 1.1 one and you get the header entry 1.2 one (- ?!) -

Re: [NTG-context] header entries semi-wrong

2011-03-10 Thread Willi Egger
I agree with Luigi, after using different length and \page I was able to produce correct output. According to me your example is probably a border case. Willi On 10 Mar 2011, at 14:59, luigi scarso wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de wrote: Am

Re: [NTG-context] header entries semi-wrong

2011-03-10 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 06.03.2011 um 11:56 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Hi, please run the minimal example attached: --on page 1 there is section 1.1 one and you get the header entry 1.1 one - on page 3 there is still section 1.1 one and you get the header entry 1.2 one (- ?!) - on page 5 there is

Re: [NTG-context] header entries semi-wrong

2011-03-10 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 10.03.2011 um 15:26 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: Am 06.03.2011 um 11:56 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Hi, please run the minimal example attached: --on page 1 there is section 1.1 one and you get the header entry 1.1 one - on page 3 there is still section 1.1 one and you get the

Re: [NTG-context] header entries semi-wrong

2011-03-10 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Of course, manually tweaking helps. Only, one needs to see that here is a page where tweaking is needed! And this is the problem: The head says 1.2 one, but it should be 1.1 one! First I trusted the automated head entries, then I realized it can be wrong and now I skim typeset books before

Re: [NTG-context] header entries semi-wrong

2011-03-10 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 10.03.2011 um 15:48 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Sure, but why does TeX write 1.2 one? The second part one is correct ... Why can't both parts be synchronized (correctly of course!)?? It’s because \headnumber is macro expansion which happens when TeX collects material for the page and

Re: [NTG-context] header entries semi-wrong

2011-03-10 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 10.03.2011 um 15:55 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Isn't there a command that gets the number that belongs to the text of \getmarking[section] \getmarking[sectionnumber] % partnumber, chapternumber etc. Wolfgang

Re: [NTG-context] header entries semi-wrong

2011-03-10 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 10.03.2011 um 15:55 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Isn't there a command that gets the number that belongs to the text of \getmarking[section] \getmarking[sectionnumber] % partnumber, chapternumber etc.

Re: [NTG-context] header entries semi-wrong

2011-03-10 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 10.03.2011 um 15:59 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: Am 10.03.2011 um 15:55 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum: Isn't there a command that gets the number that belongs to the text of \getmarking[section] \getmarking[sectionnumber] % partnumber, chapternumber etc. Yes! \getmarking[sectionnumber]

[NTG-context] header entries semi-wrong

2011-03-06 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Hi, please run the minimal example attached: --on page 1 there is section 1.1 one and you get the header entry 1.1 one - on page 3 there is still section 1.1 one and you get the header entry 1.2 one (- ?!) - on page 5 there is section 1.2 two and you get the header entry 1.2 two you see the