Good evening.
Many thanks to all of you that helped me to install teTeX 3.0. I found
that I can really use SuSE 9.3 rpms under my SuSE 9.2, which quite
surprised me. (I can't use Mr. Hagen's minimumdistribution, because
there is no MetaFont in it, and I still use some bitmapped fonts, e.g.
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
There are two things: input encoding or regime (\enableregime[utf] inyour case) and font
Many thanks, \enableregime did what I needed.
But I still have some minor questions:
1) Where should I put \loadmapfile[psclean.map]? (I can't include it in
pdftex.cnf, since
Michal Kvasnička wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
There are two things: input encoding or regime (\enableregime[utf]
inyour case) and font
Many thanks, \enableregime did what I needed.
But I still have some minor questions:
1) Where should I put \loadmapfile[psclean.map]? (I can't include it
Vit Zyka wrote:
But I get error: !Math formula deleted: Insufficient symbol fonts.
Where is the problem?
it means that your font is not a proper math font, taco may know how to deal
with this
? - \starttypescript [*] [fallback] is generaly useful. Is a good idea
replaced by a (faster) setup)
to
Vit Zyka wrote:
Adam Lindsay wrote:
Vit Zyka said this at Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:34:13 +0100:
The question is how to elegantly switch from standard (st2) tfm to
extended (st3) tfm when the glyph is not present in st2 - with
preserving \rm, \bf, \it, \bi.
basically, you declare a variant set for a
Vit Zyka said this at Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:23:05 +0100:
enco-st1.tex - ec encoding with storm glyph extension
enco-st2.tex - xl2 encoding with storm glyph extension
enco-st3.tex - variants (additional glyph) for enco-st1 and enco-st2
Vit,
I would refer you to this thread with Thomas
Hans Hagen wrote:
Vit Zyka wrote:
) I feel stronger and stronger that csr should coexist with lm for
future. Perhaps like a option (not present in minimal distr?), but
with full functionality if extra loaded.
about how many to be czechified chars are we talking?
About 33 Czech glyphs (+5 or 7
Hans Hagen wrote:
Adam Lindsay wrote:
Vit Zyka said this at Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:33:59 +0100:
But ... seeing Andulka, some support has already exists there, has
not it? I would not like to discover wheel ;-)
no, it's just a trick of the light. I picked that font name just as a
dummy example to
Vit Zyka wrote:
) I feel stronger and stronger that csr should coexist with lm for
future. Perhaps like a option (not present in minimal distr?), but with
full functionality if extra loaded.
about how many to be czechified chars are we talking?
So I would like il2 will be preserved as it is and
Adam Lindsay wrote:
Vit Zyka said this at Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:33:59 +0100:
But ... seeing Andulka, some support has already exists
there, has not it? I would not like to discover wheel ;-)
no, it's just a trick of the light.
I picked that font name just as a dummy example to get your
I wonder,
\definecharacter Aring {\ilencodedrA}
\definecharacter Lstroke {\ilencodedL}
\definecharacter lstroke {\ilencodedl}
where do these come from? is that because csr does not provide those glyphs?
(which makes il2 like aer (almoet ec) something almost il2 -)
Hans
Hans Hagen wrote:
I wonder,
\definecharacter Aring {\ilencodedrA}
\definecharacter Lstroke {\ilencodedL}
\definecharacter lstroke {\ilencodedl}
where do these come from? is that because csr does not provide those
glyphs?
il2 encoding is not ISO-8859-2 but encoding of CS fonts
Vit Zyka wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
I wonder,
\definecharacter Aring {\ilencodedrA}
\definecharacter Lstroke {\ilencodedL}
\definecharacter lstroke {\ilencodedl}
where do these come from? is that because csr does not provide those
glyphs?
il2 encoding is not ISO-8859-2 but
Vit Zyka said this at Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:34:13 +0100:
The question is how to elegantly switch from standard (st2) tfm to
extended (st3) tfm when the glyph is not present in st2 - with
preserving \rm, \bf, \it, \bi.
Example: {\bf Bold text with special char \textplus} where \texplus is
bold
Adam Lindsay wrote:
Vit Zyka said this at Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:34:13 +0100:
The question is how to elegantly switch from standard (st2) tfm to
extended (st3) tfm when the glyph is not present in st2 - with
preserving \rm, \bf, \it, \bi.
Example: {\bf Bold text with special char \textplus} where
Vit Zyka said this at Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:33:59 +0100:
But ... seeing Andulka, some support has already exists
there, has not it? I would not like to discover wheel ;-)
no, it's just a trick of the light.
I picked that font name just as a dummy example to get your attention. :)
I can't afford
16 matches
Mail list logo
