Re: [NTG-context] markdown module vs pandoc

2019-02-24 Thread Saša Janiška
Pablo Rodriguez writes: > the code in my private repository is unnecessarily complex for too > narrow cases. OK. > > I think that the most valuable feature of environment itself (the file > 'pandoc-xhtml.tex') is the practical introduction to “Dealing with XML > in ConTeXt”

Re: [NTG-context] markdown module vs pandoc

2019-02-22 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 2/21/19 9:59 PM, Gour wrote: > On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 18:50:41 +0100 Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > >> I’m still behind the environment itself, although I realized that >> these may not be relevant to everybody. I store the new commits in a >> private repository. > > Aha...I believe I might be

Re: [NTG-context] markdown module vs pandoc

2019-02-21 Thread Gour
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 18:50:41 +0100 Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > sorry for my delayed reply. No problem - there is no rush here. ;) > I’m still behind the environment itself, although I realized that > these may not be relevant to everybody. I store the new commits in a > private repository.

Re: [NTG-context] markdown module vs pandoc

2019-02-21 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 2/19/19 2:22 PM, Gour wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 17:08:44 +0100 Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > [...] >> I convert Markdown to XHTML and then I compile the XML sources with >> ConTeXt. > > I've tried it and it works nicely. The possibility to have one-source-does-all > is tempting. ;) > > Now I

Re: [NTG-context] markdown module vs pandoc

2019-02-19 Thread Gour
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 17:08:44 +0100 Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Hello Pablo, > I convert Markdown to XHTML and then I compile the XML sources with > ConTeXt. I've tried it and it works nicely. The possibility to have one-source-does-all is tempting. ;) Now I wonder if you're still behind the tool

Re: [NTG-context] markdown module vs pandoc

2019-02-18 Thread Alan Braslau
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 18:47:49 +0100 Gour wrote: > > I use TikZ when I need some ready-made stuff with possibly some fancy > > shading patterns (or when I would pass the images to LaTeX users). In > > those cases you might be able to achive the same in a lot less lines > > of code, but you usually

Re: [NTG-context] markdown module vs pandoc

2019-02-18 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Sun, 17 Feb 2019, Gour wrote: On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:34:33 -0500 (EST) Aditya Mahajan wrote: For simple documents, I use something like this (untested): It does not work - maybe I have to install stand-alone version of ConTeXt, but I got an idea. Try this:

Re: [NTG-context] markdown module vs pandoc

2019-02-18 Thread Gour
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 17:40:44 +0100 Mojca Miklavec wrote: > If I was you, I would use AsciiDoc, convert it to DocBook and process > the XML. (There is some simple proof-of-concept docbook processing > already written.) Uff, even when considering to just use AsciiDoc, I was always trying to stay

Re: [NTG-context] markdown module vs pandoc

2019-02-18 Thread Gour
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 17:08:44 +0100 Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > I convert Markdown to XHTML and then I compile the XML sources with > ConTeXt. > > I describe the method at http://www.from-pandoc-to-context.tk/. > > Just in case it might help, Thank you, I'll explore that option... Sincerely,

Re: [NTG-context] markdown module vs pandoc

2019-02-18 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 23:01, Gour wrote: > > I'm interested for using markdown markup and typeset such documents via > ConTeXt, but wonder whether it is recommended to use Markdown module or do > markdown --> ConTeXt via Pandoc? If I was you, I would use AsciiDoc, convert it to DocBook and

Re: [NTG-context] markdown module vs pandoc

2019-02-18 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 2/14/19 11:00 PM, Gour wrote: > Hello, > > I'm interested for using markdown markup and typeset such documents via > ConTeXt, but wonder whether it is recommended to use Markdown module or do > markdown --> ConTeXt via Pandoc? Hi Gour, I convert Markdown to XHTML and then I compile the XML

Re: [NTG-context] markdown module vs pandoc

2019-02-16 Thread Gour
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:34:33 -0500 (EST) Aditya Mahajan wrote: > For simple documents, I use something like this (untested): It does not work - maybe I have to install stand-alone version of ConTeXt, but I got an idea. > For more complicated documents (where I need both TeX and HTML > output),

Re: [NTG-context] markdown module vs pandoc

2019-02-15 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, Gour wrote: On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 06:11:32 -0500 (EST) Aditya Mahajan wrote: For obvious reasons, the built in markdown module is faster than calling pandoc but I prefer using pandoc rather than the markdown module for two reasons. First, pandoc provides many extensions to

Re: [NTG-context] markdown module vs pandoc

2019-02-15 Thread Gour
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 06:11:32 -0500 (EST) Aditya Mahajan wrote: > For obvious reasons, the built in markdown module is faster than > calling pandoc but I prefer using pandoc rather than the markdown > module for two reasons. First, pandoc provides many extensions to the > basic markdown syntax

Re: [NTG-context] markdown module vs pandoc

2019-02-15 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019, Gour wrote: I'm interested for using markdown markup and typeset such documents via ConTeXt, but wonder whether it is recommended to use Markdown module or do markdown --> ConTeXt via Pandoc? For obvious reasons, the built in markdown module is faster than calling pandoc

[NTG-context] markdown module vs pandoc

2019-02-14 Thread Gour
Hello, I'm interested for using markdown markup and typeset such documents via ConTeXt, but wonder whether it is recommended to use Markdown module or do markdown --> ConTeXt via Pandoc? Sincerely, Gour -- Thus the wise living entity's pure consciousness becomes covered by his eternal enemy