On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Chris Lott ch...@chrislott.org wrote:
I'm working my way through the ConTeXt manual/reference. I discovered
the draft of a new manual at:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/manual_being_revised -- is this the
latest available anywhere? I'm finding a lot of things
Am 03.01.2012 um 04:10 schrieb Chris Lott:
I'm working my way through the ConTeXt manual/reference. I discovered
the draft of a new manual at:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/manual_being_revised -- is this the
latest available anywhere? I'm finding a lot of things that are out of
date in the
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Chris Lott ch...@chrislott.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Chris Lott ch...@chrislott.org wrote:
I'm working my way through the ConTeXt manual/reference. I discovered
the draft of a new manual at:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/manual_being_revised
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
\setupfootnote == \setupnote[footnote]
The second form is the recommended way and commands like \setupfootnote
are there for backward compatibility but for new functions it’s always
Am 03.01.2012 um 18:40 schrieb Chris Lott:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
\setupfootnote == \setupnote[footnote]
The second form is the recommended way and commands like \setupfootnote
are there for backward compatibility but
I'm working my way through the ConTeXt manual/reference. I discovered
the draft of a new manual at:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/manual_being_revised -- is this the
latest available anywhere? I'm finding a lot of things that are out of
date in the new draft (for instance, using
