Re: [NTG-context] ntg-context Digest, Vol 51, Issue 36

2008-09-11 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Goebel, Juergen wrote: Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Which file do you used for test3 and which for test4? I'm sorry, seems to be too early in the morning. test3: umlaut-utf.tex test4: umlaut-latin.tex

Re: [NTG-context] ntg-context Digest, Vol 51, Issue 36

2008-09-11 Thread Goebel, Juergen
Mojca Miklavec wrote: But as far as I understood, the problem got resolved, right? Didn't the umlaut-utf work OK? No, not with my oldtimer. (Jürgen, in case that you are still using the old version of ConTeXt - *many* aspects have improved since then, including encodings and regimes, so

Re: [NTG-context] ntg-context Digest, Vol 51, Issue 36

2008-09-11 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Goebel, Juergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mojca Miklavec wrote: But as far as I understood, the problem got resolved, right? Didn't the umlaut-utf work OK? No, not with my oldtimer. (Jürgen, in case that you are still using the old version of ConTeXt -

Re: [NTG-context] ntg-context Digest, Vol 51, Issue 36

2008-09-11 Thread Goebel, Juergen
Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Can you try it again with my new test files. umlaut-iso-8859-1.tex -- no sharp s umlaut-utf-8.tex -- sharp s umlaut-windows-1250.tex -- no sharp s BTW: The download is running (or should I say crawling) with a gargantuan data rate of about 25

Re: [NTG-context] ntg-context Digest, Vol 51, Issue 36

2008-09-11 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Goebel, Juergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Can you try it again with my new test files. umlaut-iso-8859-1.tex -- no sharp s umlaut-utf-8.tex -- sharp s umlaut-windows-1250.tex -- no sharp s Can you try my updated

Re: [NTG-context] ntg-context Digest, Vol 51, Issue 36

2008-09-11 Thread Hans Hagen
Wolfgang Schuster wrote: On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Goebel, Juergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mojca Miklavec wrote: But as far as I understood, the problem got resolved, right? Didn't the umlaut-utf work OK? No, not with my oldtimer. (Jürgen, in case that you are still using the old

Re: [NTG-context] ntg-context Digest, Vol 51, Issue 36

2008-09-11 Thread Goebel, Juergen
Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Can you try my updated version of the two buggy files, I think I found the problem and want to be sure. Both versions still show no sharp s, but it's the oldtimer running. The download of the new version will soon be finished and tomorrow I'll install it - hopefully

Re: [NTG-context] ntg-context Digest, Vol 51, Issue 36

2008-09-10 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Goebel, Juergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Can you show us what do you get from my two examples. I'm going to try to and I hope the attachments will work. In short: the first example (result in test3.pdf) shows the 'eszet' while the

Re: [NTG-context] ntg-context Digest, Vol 51, Issue 36

2008-09-10 Thread Goebel, Juergen
Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Which file do you used for test3 and which for test4? I'm sorry, seems to be too early in the morning. test3: umlaut-utf.tex test4: umlaut-latin.tex Jürgen ___ If your question is of

Re: [NTG-context] ntg-context Digest, Vol 51, Issue 36

2008-09-10 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Goebel, Juergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Which file do you used for test3 and which for test4? I'm sorry, seems to be too early in the morning. test3: umlaut-utf.tex test4: umlaut-latin.tex Can you try this \enableregime[windows]

Re: [NTG-context] ntg-context Digest, Vol 51, Issue 36

2008-09-09 Thread Goebel, Juergen
Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Can you show us what do you get from my two examples. I'm going to try to and I hope the attachments will work. In short: the first example (result in test3.pdf) shows the 'eszet' while the second example (test4.pdf) doesn't. Jürgen test3.pdf Description: test3.pdf