On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Goebel, Juergen wrote:
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Which file do you used for test3 and which for test4?
I'm sorry, seems to be too early in the morning.
test3: umlaut-utf.tex
test4: umlaut-latin.tex
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
But as far as I understood, the problem got resolved, right? Didn't
the umlaut-utf work OK?
No, not with my oldtimer.
(Jürgen, in case that you are still using the old version of ConTeXt -
*many* aspects have improved since then, including encodings and
regimes, so
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Goebel, Juergen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
But as far as I understood, the problem got resolved, right? Didn't
the umlaut-utf work OK?
No, not with my oldtimer.
(Jürgen, in case that you are still using the old version of ConTeXt -
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Can you try it again with my new test files.
umlaut-iso-8859-1.tex -- no sharp s
umlaut-utf-8.tex -- sharp s
umlaut-windows-1250.tex -- no sharp s
BTW: The download is running (or should I say
crawling) with a gargantuan data rate of
about 25
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Goebel, Juergen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Can you try it again with my new test files.
umlaut-iso-8859-1.tex -- no sharp s
umlaut-utf-8.tex -- sharp s
umlaut-windows-1250.tex -- no sharp s
Can you try my updated
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Goebel, Juergen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
But as far as I understood, the problem got resolved, right? Didn't
the umlaut-utf work OK?
No, not with my oldtimer.
(Jürgen, in case that you are still using the old
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Can you try my updated version of the two buggy files, I think I found
the problem and want to be sure.
Both versions still show no sharp s,
but it's the oldtimer running. The
download of the new version will soon
be finished and tomorrow I'll install
it - hopefully
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Goebel, Juergen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Can you show us what do you get from my two examples.
I'm going to try to and I hope the attachments will work.
In short: the first example (result in test3.pdf) shows
the 'eszet' while the
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Which file do you used for test3 and which for test4?
I'm sorry, seems to be too early in the morning.
test3: umlaut-utf.tex
test4: umlaut-latin.tex
Jürgen
___
If your question is of
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Goebel, Juergen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Which file do you used for test3 and which for test4?
I'm sorry, seems to be too early in the morning.
test3: umlaut-utf.tex
test4: umlaut-latin.tex
Can you try this
\enableregime[windows]
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Can you show us what do you get from my two examples.
I'm going to try to and I hope the attachments will work.
In short: the first example (result in test3.pdf) shows
the 'eszet' while the second example (test4.pdf) doesn't.
Jürgen
test3.pdf
Description: test3.pdf
11 matches
Mail list logo