Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hans van der Meer wrote:
Thanks, I guess that is the case. If the number of \hpos's will not
overflow it shouldn't be a big problem. Can you confirm that all
these positional graphics are generated one by one, or are they
collected in a list that might overflow
Hans van der Meer wrote:
Thanks, I guess that is the case. If the number of \hpos's will not
overflow it shouldn't be a big problem. Can you confirm that all
these positional graphics are generated one by one, or are they
collected in a list that might overflow and one day cause me
Hans van der Meer wrote:
I more or less guess there are only a restricted number of overlays
possible? Could that be a correct conclusion?
Whenever you say something like
\setupbackgrounds[page][background={foreground,#1}]
you redefine the list of backgrounds that are applied to
the
On Jul 12, 2006, at 10:20, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hans van der Meer wrote:
I more or less guess there are only a restricted number of overlays
possible? Could that be a correct conclusion?
Whenever you say something like
\setupbackgrounds[page][background={foreground,#1}]
you
Hans van der Meer wrote:
I want to use the positionoverlay mechanism in several different figures
(according to the metafun manual Anchors and layers).
The problem is that the overlays show up in the last figure only, not in
the first.
If I do not typeset the second overlayseries, the
I more or less guess there are only a restricted number of overlays
possible? Could that be a correct conclusion?
The elegant way would have been being able to define separate
positionoverlays for each picture, imho. However I found a practical
solution in defining all items centrally within
I want to use the positionoverlay mechanism in several different figures (according to the metafun manual "Anchors and layers").The problem is that the overlays show up in the last figure only, not in the first.If I do not typeset the second overlayseries, the first does appear.It looks like only
