Hi all
Whenever I run texexec I encounter a series of warnings from Ruby. For example,
running texexec —version returns the following:
texexec --version
/usr/local/texlive/2013/texmf-dist/scripts/context/ruby/texexec.rb:688:
warning: class variable access from toplevel
Am 10.03.2012 um 21:32 schrieb S Barmeier:
Is there something like ruby for vertical layout?
For vertical typesetting you can also use ruby.
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please
Is there something like ruby for vertical layout?
For vertical typesetting you can also use ruby.
Wolfgang
OK, how do I use the vertical ruby in horizontal text?
___
If your question is of interest to others as
Am 11.03.2012 um 09:57 schrieb S Barmeier:
Is there something like ruby for vertical layout?
For vertical typesetting you can also use ruby.
Wolfgang
OK, how do I use the vertical ruby in horizontal text?
That’s not supported, you can only use horizontal ruby in horizontal text and
Is there something like ruby for vertical layout?
For vertical typesetting you can also use ruby.
Wolfgang
OK, how do I use the vertical ruby in horizontal text?
That’s not supported, you can only use horizontal ruby in horizontal text and
vertical ruby in vertical text.
Wolfgang
I
Am 11.03.2012 um 10:18 schrieb S Barmeier:
Is there something like ruby for vertical layout?
For vertical typesetting you can also use ruby.
Wolfgang
OK, how do I use the vertical ruby in horizontal text?
That’s not supported, you can only use horizontal ruby in horizontal text
On 03/11/2012 02:58 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 11.03.2012 um 10:18 schrieb S Barmeier:
Is there something like ruby for vertical layout?
For vertical typesetting you can also use ruby.
Wolfgang
OK, how do I use the vertical ruby in horizontal text?
That’s not supported, you can
Is there something like ruby for vertical layout?
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Am 04.03.2012 um 14:26 schrieb S Barmeier:
Is it possible to place the ruby text in a margin?
No.
This would allow me to keep line spacing decently tight and also prevent
the reader from only reading the annotation.
This can be added but then you need a symbol (or something else) to
On 03/09/2012 04:30 PM, ntg-context-requ...@ntg.nl wrote:
Is it possible to place the ruby text in a margin?
No.
This would allow me to keep line spacing decently tight and also
prevent
the reader from only reading the annotation.
This can be added but then you need a symbol
Is it possible to place the ruby text in a margin?
This would allow me to keep line spacing decently tight and also prevent
the reader from only reading the annotation.
How can one change the font size of the annotation and is there a way to
keep it fixed, not being scaled according to the font
Am 04.03.2012 um 10:11 schrieb S Barmeier:
Is it possible to place the ruby text in a margin?
No.
This would allow me to keep line spacing decently tight and also prevent
the reader from only reading the annotation.
This can be added but then you need a symbol (or something else) to see
to
Is it possible to place the ruby text in a margin?
No.
This would allow me to keep line spacing decently tight and also prevent
the reader from only reading the annotation.
This can be added but then you need a symbol (or something else) to see
to which word the annotation refers.
I'm
\usemodule[ruby]
\setupruby[overhang=start]
\starttext
foo \ruby{bar}{foo bar baz} baz
\stoptext
end,yes,auto all give overhang=none. Am I doing something wrong?
Severin
___
If your question is of interest to others
Am 04.03.2012 um 15:43 schrieb S Barmeier:
\usemodule[ruby]
\setupruby[overhang=start]
\starttext
foo \ruby{bar}{foo bar baz} baz
\stoptext
end,yes,auto all give overhang=none. Am I doing something wrong?
You need also “align=center” because by default the base text is stretched
(with
Jose Augusto wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, here it goes. Atached are the files used in the test.
The problem as reported in the previous email used
the file with the offending chars wrapped in a main file, which was just:
\starttext
\input zzz.tex
\stoptext
That is, the offending chars were in
Hi all,
I think I solved the problem. At least for my actual errors...
I read the following net article about string coding in ruby 1.9 and up:
http://blog.grayproductions.net/articles/ruby_19s_string
With that info at hand, I made two brute-force trial patches (read
the
above article
I Hans,
I just sent a mail with a possible patch, before I read this answer from you
:-)
As I say there, the patches work (at least for me) and I had updated context
mkii a few hours ago, so I don't know if the betas you mentioned have
already
been installed...
Hope the proposed patches be
Jose Augusto wrote:
I Hans,
I just sent a mail with a possible patch, before I read this answer from you
:-)
As I say there, the patches work (at least for me) and I had updated context
mkii a few hours ago, so I don't know if the betas you mentioned have
already
been installed...
Hope the
Hi Hans,
The patch I proposed works also with ruby less than 1.9 (e.g. ruby 1.8.7)!
The force_encoding() method is used only if RUBY_VERSION = 1.9.
If the scripts are executed by ruby 1.8 or lesser version, there's no change
done to
the current line of code (e.g. 'case line.chomp' ).
Also, I
Jose Augusto wrote:
Meanwhile I don't think that the magic string
# encoding: ASCII-8BIT
solves the problem. This string indicates that the script is written in
ASCII-8BIT,
but when is reading the strings from the .tex or .tui files ruby 1.9.1
considers
them as US-ASCII regardless of the
Hi Hans,
I ran just now ruby 1.8.6 and the force_encoding() patch worked well.
Just now I upgrade --context=current. The banner in the texexec.rb is
banner = ['TeXExec', 'version 6.2.1', '1997-2009', 'PRAGMA ADE/POD']
and the date of this script (after updating) is 10-04-2009 (its April..)
I'm
Jose Augusto wrote:
Hi Hans,
I ran just now ruby 1.8.6 and the force_encoding() patch worked well.
yes, but if we can avoid adapting all those strings ... i'm pretty sure
that if we follow that route we have to patch a lot
also keep in mind that in 1.9 there are several encodings (external
Hi all,
A few weeks ago I reported a problem with ruby 1.9.1, which
was solved by removing the offending .tui line (Mojca and Hans
AFAIR). The problem was related with the existence of non-ascii
chars in the .tui file. Sadly it strikes again, now when chars with
accents appear in titles
hi hans---just curious. do you plan conTeXt to use just one computer
language in the future?
/iaw
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist :
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 21:09, ivo welch wrote:
hi hans---just curious. do you plan conTeXt to use just one computer
language in the future?
(even though I'm not Hans ...)
No. At least TeX, lua and metapost will probably stay, so that already
adds to three languages :) :) :)
If talking
ivo welch wrote:
hi hans---just curious. do you plan conTeXt to use just one computer
language in the future?
indeed. most useful script are already converted to lua (mtx-* files
that run on top of mtxrun); the advantage is that mtxrun has a built in
filedatabase handler (so we don't use
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 21:09, ivo welch wrote:
hi hans---just curious. do you plan conTeXt to use just one computer
language in the future?
(even though I'm not Hans ...)
No. At least TeX, lua and metapost will probably stay, so that already
adds to three languages
Hi,
Akira reported problems with context and ruby 1.9 and it looks like
there are some upward incompatible changes in ruby (even syntax) so i
need some time to figure that out. In the meantime ... just avoid using
texexec with ruby 1.9
Hans
Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
Hi all,
I'm in the middle of putting together a native Mac OS X edition of
ConTeXt Minimal ... for this I need to know which version of Ruby is
minimally required by the latest ConTeXt release. (It wouldn't hurt
though to know this for older ConTeXt versions,
Hi all,
I'm in the middle of putting together a native Mac OS X edition of
ConTeXt Minimal ... for this I need to know which version of Ruby is
minimally required by the latest ConTeXt release. (It wouldn't hurt
though to know this for older ConTeXt versions, too ;-) Any help
appreciated.
Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
Hi all,
I'm in the middle of putting together a native Mac OS X edition of
ConTeXt Minimal ... for this I need to know which version of Ruby is
minimally required by the latest ConTeXt release. (It wouldn't hurt
though to know this for older ConTeXt versions,
Until a few minutes ago my Linux Slackware system dd not have a
Ruby interpreter. Yet Context runs fine. I seem to remember
something about some components of Context existing as Ruby
scripts. Am I dreaming or are there such beasties?
--
John Culleton
Books with answers to marketing and
Le 12 mai 05 à 09:01, Hans Hagen a écrit :
luigi.scarso wrote:
A little off-topic: why ruby and not python ?
- i didn't like those tabs/indentation
- ruby's reminded me of modula which i used a (real) lot in the past
- ruby has a small footprint
- i just like it
Hans
I agree with the
Maurice Diamantini wrote:
What about Lua, Adding one more dependency to ConTeXt make it
more difficult to install and maintain.
So what is the advantage of luo in conTeXt instead of ruby?
perl, python, ruby are 'huge', and distributing them with tex is a problem; lua is 'made for embedding'
Maurice Diamantini wrote:
What about Lua, Adding one more dependency to ConTeXt make it
more difficult to install and maintain.
btw, it's not a dependency: lua will be 'always pesent in the binary'
and since we nowadays only have one binary ... also, my guess is that
adding it to aleph is
Hi Maurice,
Maurice Diamantini wrote:
What about Lua, Adding one more dependency to ConTeXt make it
more difficult to install and maintain.
So what is the advantage of luo in conTeXt instead of ruby?
Lua will not be 'in context', but 'in pdftex': the lua library
will be integrated in the
Hans Hagen wrote:
btw, it's not a dependency: lua will be 'always pesent in the binary'
and since we nowadays only have one binary ... also, my guess is that
adding it to aleph is easy
ok, secret link: http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/luatex.pdf
FANTASTIC!! It's what I want.
I
Hans Hagen wrote:
Hi,
when pondering about some ruby to bin for unix and googling a bit,
A little off-topic: why ruby and not python ?
i ran into:
http://www.erikveen.dds.nl/ruby.html
amazing stuff, not only rubyscript2exe (cross platform)!
bookmarked
luigi
luigi.scarso wrote:
A little off-topic: why ruby and not python ?
- i didn't like those tabs/indentation
- ruby's reminded me of modula which i used a (real) lot in the past
- ruby has a small footprint
- i just like it
Hans
-
Hans Hagen, May 11:
when pondering about some ruby to bin for unix
Why would you want to do that?
because ruby is not always installed (for some reason distribution do
install tons of useless games and all kind of progs whose name i
instantly forget, but no forget to install a recent
luigi scarso wrote:
Almost 1 year ago, Nagy Bence posted at comp.tex.pdftex a email with
subject Ruby in TeX where he wrote
The pdtex mailing list, yes? I assume you are talking about this
thread:
http://www.tug.org/pipermail/pdftex/2004-February/004762.html
and it's parent:
It's seem useful as starting point.
Many thanks, taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
43 matches
Mail list logo
