I copied my self compiled luatex to /usr/local/context/bin and first-setup.sh
worked as expected.
Now i can use the freshest luatex 1.0.4 with todays context beta on my phone.
Thank you all.
Am 18. Februar 2017 12:55:51 MEZ schrieb luigi scarso :
>On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Lutz Haseloff wrote:
> Okay, I used the self compiled experimental luatex.
> And so does the luatex from the context minimals behave:
>
> (It is rather old)
>
> root@localhost:~# /usr/local/context/bin/luatex --version
> This is LuaTeX,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Lutz Haseloff wrote:
> Okay, I used the self compiled experimental luatex.
> And so does the luatex from the context minimals behave:
>
> (It is rather old)
>
> root@localhost:~# /usr/local/context/bin/luatex --version
> This is LuaTeX,
Okay, I used the self compiled experimental luatex.
And so does the luatex from the context minimals behave:
(It is rather old)
root@localhost:~# /usr/local/context/bin/luatex --version
This is LuaTeX, Version 1.0.0 (TeX Live 2017/dev)
Execute 'luatex --credits' for credits and version
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Lutz Haseloff wrote:
> luatex --version
> This is LuaTeX, Version 1.0.4 (TeX Live 2017/dev)
hm why luatex 1.0.4 ?
I expected that mtxrun installed luatex 1.0.3
>
> Execute 'luatex --credits' for credits and version details.
>
> There is NO
luatex --version
This is LuaTeX, Version 1.0.4 (TeX Live 2017/dev)
Execute 'luatex --credits' for credits and version details.
There is NO warranty. Redistribution of this software is covered by
the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2 or (at your option)
any later version. For
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Lutz Haseloff wrote:
> Does that mean, that i can't use the new beta on my phone until linux armhf
> supports lua ffi?
> btw the new luatex 1.0.4 runs fine here.
hm, you should have a luatex on your bin folder;
can you run test.lua
--[=[
Does that mean, that i can't use the new beta on my phone until linux armhf
supports lua ffi?
btw the new luatex 1.0.4 runs fine here.
Am 18. Februar 2017 10:50:48 MEZ schrieb luigi scarso :
>On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Lutz Haseloff
>wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Lutz Haseloff wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> it seems that the new ConTeXt on the linux armhf platform is not really up
> to date yet.
>
> When i start the update with
> sh ./first-setup.sh --modules=all --keep
> I get:
> -
>
Hi all,
it seems that the new ConTeXt on the linux armhf platform is not really up to
date yet.
When i start the update with
sh ./first-setup.sh --modules=all --keep
I get:
-
root@localhost:/usr/local/context# sh ./first-setup.sh --modules=all
--engine=luatex --keep
receiving
Am 17.02.2017 um 14:30 schrieb luigi scarso:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Peter Rolf wrote:
>> There seems to be a problem with the latest beta (at least on my
>> Windows10 system). The synchronisation breaks right after the start.
>>
>> -
>>
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Peter Rolf wrote:
> There seems to be a problem with the latest beta (at least on my
> Windows10 system). The synchronisation breaks right after the start.
>
> -
> v:\tmp\context>first-setup.bat
> receiving incremental file list
>
> sent 96
There seems to be a problem with the latest beta (at least on my
Windows10 system). The synchronisation breaks right after the start.
-
v:\tmp\context>first-setup.bat
receiving incremental file list
sent 96 bytes received 273 bytes 246.00 bytes/sec
total size is 12066614 speedup is
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:28:48 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
i uploaded a beta so things should be in sync in a while
thanks a lot. I can confirm that the crash is no longer happening.
joerg
-
i uploaded a beta so things should be in sync in a while
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 |
On 2/16/2017 7:51 PM, j. van den hoff wrote:
hi,
in a pristine standalone context (installed yesterday) under ubuntu I
see a seemingly consistent crash of luatex if the document contains
footnotes
that is indeed something that will be solved when i update
minimal example:
\starttext
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:56:55 +0100
"j. van den hoff" wrote:
> just to avoid confusion: my initial report concerned x86_64 linux.
I have no problem with your MWE under 64bit linux.
Hans did point-out that there might be some instability today as we are
in the process of
On 02/16/2017 10:32 PM, j. van den hoff wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 22:20:14 +0100, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> You might try the 32bit version for Linux.
> [...]
> unfortunately this does not run through:
> `source temp-ctx-install/tex/setuptex' complains `binaries for
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 22:20:14 +0100, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 02/16/2017 09:56 PM, j. van den hoff wrote:
[...]
just to avoid confusion: my initial report concerned x86_64 linux.
I know and you’d have downloaded the Linux64 binaries.
understood.
You might try the 32bit
On 02/16/2017 09:56 PM, j. van den hoff wrote:
> [...]
> just to avoid confusion: my initial report concerned x86_64 linux.
I know and you’d have downloaded the Linux64 binaries.
You might try the 32bit version for Linux. It takes less than 2 minutes
with a decent internet connection. After
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:54:01 +0100, Alan Braslau
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:40:40 +0100
Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 02/16/2017 07:51 PM, j. van den hoff wrote:
> hi,
> in a pristine standalone context (installed yesterday) under ubuntu
> I see a
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:40:40 +0100
Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> On 02/16/2017 07:51 PM, j. van den hoff wrote:
> > hi,
> > in a pristine standalone context (installed yesterday) under ubuntu
> > I see a seemingly consistent crash of luatex if the document
> > contains footnotes [...]
>
On 02/16/2017 07:51 PM, j. van den hoff wrote:
> hi,
> in a pristine standalone context (installed yesterday) under ubuntu I see
> a seemingly consistent crash of luatex if the document contains footnotes
> [...]
> while without the footnote it does compile just fine (the same happens in
>
I could compile the MWE with no problems whatsoever on arch linux 64bit.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:36 PM, j. van den hoff wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 20:32:28 +0100, Alan Braslau
> wrote:
>
>> I confirm this (with a different error message) on 32bit
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 20:32:28 +0100, Alan Braslau
wrote:
I confirm this (with a different error message) on 32bit linux,
thanks for confirming this.
but it compiles fine on 64bit linux, 64bit freebsd and 64bit osx.
in my case it happens on a 64 bit linux(ubuntu)
I confirm this (with a different error message) on 32bit linux,
but it compiles fine on 64bit linux, 64bit freebsd and 64bit osx.
Alan
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 19:51:25 +0100
"j. van den hoff" wrote:
> in a pristine standalone context (installed yesterday) under ubuntu I
>
hi,
in a pristine standalone context (installed yesterday) under ubuntu I see
a seemingly consistent crash of luatex if the document contains footnotes
minimal example:
\starttext
foo\footnote{bar}
\stoptext
which crashes with this output:
8<-
27 matches
Mail list logo