Re: [NTG-context] style questions

2004-01-04 Thread Hans Hagen
At 20:49 01/01/2004, you wrote: 1. I want to mark some words consistently and used the \definesynonyms command for this, although I only use the second form. \definesynonyms[glossar][explanation][\infull] \glossar [ZOPE] {\em Zope} {Web Applikationsserver} Is there a better way to

[NTG-context] style questions

2004-01-01 Thread Janko Hauser
Hello everybody, Over the last days I started to write a Requirement document. I started from the example documents provided at the fiee-site, which are a big help. I use this as an exercise to see, what markup is actually needed in the content, to transform from XML documents later on. First

Re: [NTG-context] style questions

2004-01-01 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am Donnerstag, 01.01.04, um 20:49 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Janko Hauser: 2. In the example there is an indirection for the section definitions. \definehead [Topic] [chapter] \definehead [Nopic] [title] Later on the newly defined headers are styled. But they are used as the

Re: [NTG-context] style questions

2004-01-01 Thread Janko Hauser
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 23:23:41 +0100 Henning Hraban Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Donnerstag, 01.01.04, um 20:49 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Janko Hauser: 2. In the example there is an indirection for the section definitions. \definehead [Topic] [chapter] \definehead