Hello Hans,
Since there is no more need, to keep compatibility with MKII (there are
already a lot of differences), I suggest - for the benefit of beginners -
to change at least 2 things:
- let \framed or \externalfigure behave like \parbox and \includegraphics
in LaTeX, i.e. no more need to
Hi Peter,
Peter Münster wrote:
Hello Hans,
Since there is no more need, to keep compatibility with MKII (there are
already a lot of differences), I suggest - for the benefit of beginners -
to change at least 2 things:
- let \framed or \externalfigure behave like \parbox and
Am 19.08.2009 um 14:41 schrieb Peter Münster:
Hello Hans,
Since there is no more need, to keep compatibility with MKII (there
are
already a lot of differences), I suggest - for the benefit of
beginners -
to change at least 2 things:
- let \framed or \externalfigure behave like \parbox
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi Peter,
Peter Münster wrote:
Hello Hans,
Since there is no more need, to keep compatibility with MKII (there are
already a lot of differences), I suggest - for the benefit of beginners -
to change at least 2 things:
- let \framed or \externalfigure behave like \parbox
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Since there is no more need, to keep compatibility with MKII (there are
already a lot of differences), I suggest - for the benefit of beginners -
to change at least 2 things:
- let \framed or \externalfigure behave like \parbox and
Peter Münster wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Since there is no more need, to keep compatibility with MKII (there are
already a lot of differences), I suggest - for the benefit of beginners -
to change at least 2 things:
- let \framed or \externalfigure behave like