Re: [NTG-context] terrible png placement

2011-12-03 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Hans, On Mac OS X 10.7.2, testing your file I get afile of 110 KB with mkii, and 72 KB with mkiv (from the minimals). You can find the outputs here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4316076/test-png-mkii.pdf http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4316076/test-png-mkiv.pdf All this with ConTeXt ver:

Re: [NTG-context] terrible png placement

2011-11-11 Thread Meer, H. van der
Sofar I received 2 reactions. (1) Can't reproduce here; I get a 70KB pdf with your file and image. ConTeXt standalone, 32-bit Linux, mkiv, version 2011.10.01 10:48. (2) I've encountered the same problem. The PDF is 1.8MB big. Compressed with qpdf (qpdf --stream-data=compress) its only 60KB!

Re: [NTG-context] terrible png placement

2011-11-10 Thread Pontus Lurcock
On Thu 10 Nov 2011, Hans van der Meer wrote: Something terrible must be done to png pictures, either in ConTeXt or in luatex. I have the following minimal sample code and picture. I include the png for those who want to check. % Test png addition. \starttext Place png figure.\par