Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl writes:
On 1-2-2012 19:31, Marco Pessotto wrote:
Hello there.
See the following minimal example. Without the \setupinteraction the
document compiles just fine.
as there is no beta this week, you can patch yourself ... scrn-wid.lua
... should either have
Am 03.02.2012 um 10:13 schrieb Marco Pessotto:
This is better, as the compilation doesn't fail and the comment appears
as comment, but on the page there is a literal [title=,] (in the first
example) or [title=commentname,] in the second and third example.
scrn-wid.mkvi
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com writes:
Am 03.02.2012 um 10:13 schrieb Marco Pessotto:
This is better, as the compilation doesn't fail and the comment appears
as comment, but on the page there is a literal [title=,] (in the first
example) or [title=commentname,] in the
On 3-2-2012 15:19, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
@Hans: \scrn_comment_start_indeed is defined twice
\def\scrn_comment_start_indeed
{\doifelse{\commentparameter\c!state}\v!start
{\scrn_comment_start_indeed}
{\scrn_comment_start_ignore}}
On 1-2-2012 19:31, Marco Pessotto wrote:
Hello there.
See the following minimal example. Without the \setupinteraction the
document compiles just fine.
as there is no beta this week, you can patch yourself ... scrn-wid.lua
... should either have
b_scrn_comment_link
or
