On 28 June 2017 at 13:49, Thomas Widmann wrote:
> On 28 June 2017 at 12:57, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> On 6/28/2017 1:20 PM, Thomas Widmann wrote:
>>
>>> What I'd really like to know is whether the relevant parts of TeX have
>>> been Luafied already (in which case
On 28 June 2017 at 12:57, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/28/2017 1:20 PM, Thomas Widmann wrote:
>
>> What I'd really like to know is whether the relevant parts of TeX have
>> been Luafied already (in which case I might do it soon), or whether
>> doing this would require making changes to
On 6/28/2017 1:20 PM, Thomas Widmann wrote:
Thanks, Hans! I never expected it to work out of the box, and I'm
quite happy to do a lot of programming to make it work.
What I'd really like to know is whether the relevant parts of TeX have
been Luafied already (in which case I might do it soon),
On 28 June 2017 at 12:04, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/28/2017 11:16 AM, Thomas Widmann wrote:
>>
>> If the answer is 'no', that's OK. I reckon it might be, given that TeX
>> builds the paragraphs first and then split them to create pages, and I
>> basically want the page builder to be
On 6/28/2017 11:16 AM, Thomas Widmann wrote:
On 26 June 2017 at 10:31, Thomas Widmann wrote:
[...] Is there a way in ConTeXt/LuaTeX to typeset a column
repeatedly until it fulfils certain criteria (such as not generating
an orphan or a widow)?
Perhaps it would be easier
On 26 June 2017 at 10:31, Thomas Widmann wrote:
> [...] Is there a way in ConTeXt/LuaTeX to typeset a column
> repeatedly until it fulfils certain criteria (such as not generating
> an orphan or a widow)?
>
> Perhaps it would be easier if I didn't think of it as a column,
On 25 June 2017 at 12:16, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/24/2017 4:48 PM, Thomas Widmann wrote:
>>
>> Lots of published dictionaries are full of orphans and widows because
>> they're so hard to avoid without a lot of manual intervention, which
>> is why I'm keen to explore any novel ways
On 6/24/2017 4:48 PM, Thomas Widmann wrote:
On 24 June 2017 at 01:19, Henri Menke wrote:
How about putting every entry into a box, making it unbreakable? Of course,
you get unbalanced
columns this way, but I think keeping the entries together is easier for the
reader.
On 24 June 2017 at 01:19, Henri Menke wrote:
>
> How about putting every entry into a box, making it unbreakable? Of course,
> you get unbalanced
> columns this way, but I think keeping the entries together is easier for the
> reader.
Thanks for your suggestion, but I
On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 17:52 +0100, Thomas Widmann wrote:
> On 23 June 2017 at 14:21, Thomas Widmann wrote:
> >
> > On 20 June 2017 at 20:33, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6/20/2017 11:53 AM, Thomas Widmann wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 20 June 2017
On 23 June 2017 at 14:21, Thomas Widmann wrote:
> On 20 June 2017 at 20:33, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> On 6/20/2017 11:53 AM, Thomas Widmann wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20 June 2017 at 10:41, Henri Menke wrote:
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at
On 20 June 2017 at 20:33, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/20/2017 11:53 AM, Thomas Widmann wrote:
>>
>> On 20 June 2017 at 10:41, Henri Menke wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 09:22 +0100, Thomas Widmann wrote:
I recently started experimenting
On 6/20/2017 11:53 AM, Thomas Widmann wrote:
On 20 June 2017 at 10:41, Henri Menke wrote:
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 09:22 +0100, Thomas Widmann wrote:
I recently started experimenting with using ConTeXt (mkiv) for dictionary
typesetting. It's a much
more attractive option
On 20 June 2017 at 10:41, Henri Menke wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 09:22 +0100, Thomas Widmann wrote:
> >
> > I recently started experimenting with using ConTeXt (mkiv) for dictionary
> > typesetting. It's a much
> > more attractive option than plain TeX or LaTeX
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 09:22 +0100, Thomas Widmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently started experimenting with using ConTeXt (mkiv) for dictionary
> typesetting. It's a much
> more attractive option than plain TeX or LaTeX because of the support for
> typesetting on a grid.
>
> However, grid
15 matches
Mail list logo