Actually it was not the gap that bothered me. You are right, DIN 676 B says
45mm. But this seems to be useless as all window envelopes (that I possess)
have their window at 50mm. It defeats the purpose of the backaddress field,
which is hidden by the DIN layout. Shouldn't they be able to
Am 28.10.2010 um 19:04 schrieb Florian Wobbe:
Dear Wolfgang,
the default vertical placement of the backaddress is to high in dinb.nls.
The position of the backaddress os correct but i think you don’t like the large
gap between the backaddress and the address. The gap is there because it’s
On Oct 28, 2010, at 21:11 , Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 28.10.2010 um 19:04 schrieb Florian Wobbe:
Dear Wolfgang,
the default vertical placement of the backaddress is to high in dinb.nls.
The position of the backaddress os correct but i think you don’t like the
large gap between the
Hello Wolfgang,
thanks again!
Greetings,
Andreas
Am 10.10.2009 um 09:13 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 09.10.2009 um 10:11 schrieb Andreas Harder:
Now one have to care of the width (I think there is no maxwidth-
option for frame setups?), so I tried to set the backgroundaddress-
Am 09.10.2009 um 10:11 schrieb Andreas Harder:
Now one have to care of the width (I think there is no maxwidth-
option for frame setups?), so I tried to set the backgroundaddress-
style to style={\ifdim\framedwidth85mm \tfx \else \tfxx \fi}. But
the problem is, that \framedwidth measures
Am 09.10.2009 um 06:45 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
When I think about the default setup this would make more sense:
\setupletterstyle[backaddress=no]
\setupletterstyle[backaddress][alternative=auto]
WHat do you think?
I think it would be more intuitive that way.
One more question: it would
Am 09.10.2009 um 10:11 schrieb Andreas Harder:
When I think about the default setup this would make more sense:
\setupletterstyle[backaddress=no]
\setupletterstyle[backaddress][alternative=auto]
WHat do you think?
I think it would be more intuitive that way.
I will change this then in
Hello Wolfgang,
thank you for your explanations!
One more question: it would be nice if the rule under the back-address
would have the same length an the back-addres. Is there a convenient
way? I tried something with \textbackgrounds (example below) but
without success.
% from the wiki:
Am 09.10.2009 um 01:24 schrieb Andreas Harder:
Hello Wolfgang,
thank you for your explanations!
When I think about the default setup this would make more sense:
\setupletterstyle[backaddress=no]
\setupletterstyle[backaddress][alternative=auto]
WHat do you think?
One more question: it