On 24-10-2012 06:06, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 21-10-2012 04:35, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Andreas Mang wrote:
Hi there,
As Aditya mentioned in a former posting (*) that \text{ ... }
should
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 21-10-2012 04:35, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Andreas Mang wrote:
Hi there,
As Aditya mentioned in a former posting (*) that \text{ ... }
should scale properly when used as super- or
On 21-10-2012 04:35, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Andreas Mang wrote:
Hi there,
As Aditya mentioned in a former posting (*) that \text{ ... }
should scale properly when used as super- or subscript, I have
prepared a minimal example to
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Andreas Mang wrote:
Hi there,
As Aditya mentioned in a former posting (*) that \text{ ... } should
scale properly when used as super- or subscript, I have prepared a
minimal example to demonstrate that it doesn't. In my document I have
switched from \text{ } to \normal,
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Andreas Mang wrote:
Hi there,
As Aditya mentioned in a former posting (*) that \text{ ... } should
scale properly when used as super- or subscript, I have prepared a minimal
example to demonstrate that it doesn't. In my
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 09:10:17 +0200
Andreas Mang m...@imt.uni-luebeck.de wrote:
Hi there,
As Aditya mentioned in a former posting (*) that \text{ ... }
should scale properly when used as super- or subscript, I have
prepared a minimal example to demonstrate that it doesn't. In my
document I
Hi Alan,
thanks for your help. That's indeed an option, but not much of a difference to
using \normal I suppose.
In addition, \text has the nice feature of preserving the space character,
which makes it very useful for lazy people (of course I can add \, and
friends but...).
Cheers,
Andreas
