Re: [NTG-context] mathcal generates error in ConTeXt

2022-03-26 Thread Wolfgang Schuster via ntg-context
A A via ntg-context schrieb am 26.03.2022 um 08:50: Hi Jan, Thanks, I was starting to think pandoc is not yet mature enough to handle these conversions, but it looks like that might not be the case. \mathcal works now, but I actually ran into another issue in my real document. I have the

Re: [NTG-context] mathcal generates error in ConTeXt

2022-03-26 Thread A A via ntg-context
Hi Jan, Thanks, I was starting to think pandoc is not yet mature enough to handle these conversions, but it looks like that might not be the case. \mathcal works now, but I actually ran into another issue in my real document. I have the following defined in my LaTeX: *$C = ``\textrm{dad}``$*

Re: [NTG-context] mathcal generates error in ConTeXt

2022-03-26 Thread Jan-Erik Hägglöf via ntg-context
HI! It generates no \starttext \stoptext tag It works with this though \starttext $\mathcal{A}$ \stoptext But with the -s option you get a standalone version of the document pandoc -s -f latex -t context -o test_context.tex test.tex /Janne > 26 mars 2022 kl. 06:39 skrev A A via

Re: [NTG-context] mathcal

2007-07-04 Thread Jean Magnan de Bornier
Le 04 juillet à 07:42:30 Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit notamment: | 2007/7/3, Jean Magnan de Bornier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | Hi all, | With \usemodule[amsl], I get un error when using \mathcal: | .. | recently read \mathcal | | l.187 loterie $\mathcal |

Re: [NTG-context] mathcal

2007-07-04 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote: That's exactly what I needed, thanks a lot Wolfgang; I was being maybe too confident in this: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math_with_amsl I think that amsl module is not really needed now. ConTeXt has most (all?) features provided by amsl.

Re: [NTG-context] mathcal

2007-07-03 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
2007/7/3, Jean Magnan de Bornier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, With \usemodule[amsl], I get un error when using \mathcal: .. recently read \mathcal l.187 loterie $\mathcal {L}$, $R'$, sont égaux. .. Should it not