Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Hi Hans, Thanks a lot for the new beta and for having fixed the issue with luametatex binaries. Everything works great with version 2019.12.06 21:40. Best regards: OK > On 6 Dec 2019, at 15:05, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 12/6/2019 1:34 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: > >> Is this too old? Is this

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 12/6/2019 1:34 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: Is this too old? Is this file created during installation or is it contained in the zip files downloaded from Pragma's site? Ok, I think that there is some issue with the builder. Mojca, it looks like there is no binary upload happening after a

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Hi again, I just installed anew lmtx from Pragma website http://lmtx.pragma-ade.nl/install-lmtx/context-osx-64.zip and I have the same problem: the format cannot be made. Looking at luametatex in a Terminal window, I get -rwxr--r-- 1 kavian staff 2.7M Dec 6 13:15

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 12/5/2019 8:28 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Hans, Thanks for the new features and the new release. I could download the new installer for MacOS which installs the latest version but it cannot make the formats ending with the error message which I copy below. Best regards: OK PS: this is

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Otared Kavian schrieb am 06.12.2019 um 04:23: Dear Hans, The problem I described in my previous message comes indeed from \defineexpansion which is not defined. Upon commenting out the lines 95--98 in the file « hand-ini.mkxl » that is the four lines: \defineexpansion [\c!step=1,

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Hello, ** Otared Kavian [2019-12-06 04:23:28 +0100]: > Dear Hans, > The problem I described in my previous message comes indeed from > \defineexpansion which is not defined. Upon commenting out the lines > 95--98 in the file « hand-ini.mkxl » that is the four lines: > \defineexpansion >

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Dear Hans, The problem I described in my previous message comes indeed from \defineexpansion which is not defined. Upon commenting out the lines 95--98 in the file « hand-ini.mkxl » that is the four lines: \defineexpansion [\c!step=1, \c!stretch=40, \c!shrink=20] I could remake the

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Hi Hans, Thanks for the new features and the new release. I could download the new installer for MacOS which installs the latest version but it cannot make the formats ending with the error message which I copy below. Best regards: OK PS: this is the error message when installing: tex error

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 11/13/19 9:34 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 11/12/2019 10:20 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > >> LMTX has no problems with this. Could you fix this in MkIV? > > Can you check again? Many thanks for your fast fix, Hans. Everything works fine now. Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 11/12/2019 10:20 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: LMTX has no problems with this. Could you fix this in MkIV? Can you check again? Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 11/12/19 7:50 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > Hi, > > I uploaded a new beta. Apart from some fixes, the main change in lmtx is > that on windows most (a few exceptions) of the mechanisms that interface > to the operating system support the internal wide character model which > should make the lot more

Re: [NTG-context] New beta and definepagebreak

On 12/18/2015 9:38 AM, Jan U. Hasecke wrote: Hi all, after updating to the new beta this doesn't work anymore. \definepagebreak [pagebreak:chapter] [yes, header, footer] \setuphead [chapter,title] [page=pagebreak:chapter] \starttext \chapter{Lorem ipsum} \input tufte

Re: [NTG-context] New beta has issues with maths…

On 12/18/2015 12:53 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Hans, I just installed the new beta for testing purposes. In math mode the exponennts, indices, and punctuations do not work properly as you may see in the attached files. ok, an engine bug (something goes out of range) (math mode active

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 19 November 2015 at 22:29, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 17 November 2015 at 11:53, Hans Hagen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There is a new beta coming but it goes in sync with a new release of luatex >> (0.85). As there have been some fundamental changes the macros and engine >> need to be updated in sync

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 11/20/2015 8:03 AM, Schmitz Thomas A. wrote: On 19 Nov 2015, at 22:45, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: I have just updated and compilation from XML sources works fine again (at least with the file I tested ;-)). The problem with xml entities persists. They are not processed, but

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 17 November 2015 at 11:53, Hans Hagen wrote: > Hi, > > There is a new beta coming but it goes in sync with a new release of luatex > (0.85). As there have been some fundamental changes the macros and engine > need to be updated in sync so when something goes wrong with an update, be > patient

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 11/19/2015 10:29 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 17 November 2015 at 11:53, Hans Hagen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There is a new beta coming but it goes in sync with a new release of luatex >> (0.85). As there have been some fundamental changes the macros and engine >> need to be updated in sync so

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

> On 19 Nov 2015, at 22:45, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > > I have just updated and compilation from XML sources works fine again > (at least with the file I tested ;-)). The problem with xml entities persists. They are not processed, but printed as is. I sent an example on Oct. 13.

Re: [NTG-context] new beta - \pushbackground broken

On 7/12/2015 12:22 AM, Lukáš Procházka wrote: Hello, \pushbackground seems to be broken in the last beta - this doesn't compile (but it did till now): works ok here ... also, that code hasn't changed -

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 07/11/2015 10:53 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 7/11/2015 7:17 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: [...] I’m afraid that newotf crashes with this sample: [...] define crashes ... i donwloaded the font, ran mtxrun --generate and remade the font database and this works: [GFS Didot Classic] I

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Pablo Rodriguez schrieb: On 07/11/2015 12:57 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: [...] The font [1,2] works for me without problems. [1] http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces20th.html [2] http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces19th.html They all work fine for me until I load:

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 07/11/2015 12:57 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: [...] The font [1,2] works for me without problems. [1] http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces20th.html [2] http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/pages/en_typefaces19th.html They all work fine for me until I load: \usemodule[newotf]

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 7/11/2015 7:17 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 07/11/2015 01:33 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 7/10/2015 5:05 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: [...] resolversmodules 'newotf' is not found i had a typo in the zip maker ... that file is missing (the rest is there) (i've send the file send in

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Pablo Rodriguez schrieb: On 07/11/2015 01:33 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 7/10/2015 5:05 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: [...] resolvers modules 'newotf' is not found i had a typo in the zip maker ... that file is missing (the rest is there) (i've send the file send in another mail to list)

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 07/11/2015 01:26 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: [...] Do you get the same problem when you use the font as main font? \usemodule[newotf] \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][GFS Didot] \setupbodyfont[mainface] \starttext αβγ {\bf αβγ} \stoptext Yes, I do. Pablo --

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 07/11/2015 02:02 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Do you get the same problem when you use the font as main font? \usemodule[newotf] \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][GFS Didot] \setupbodyfont[mainface] \starttext αβγ {\bf αβγ} \stoptext Yes, I do. Pablo Both Wolfgang's file and your

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Pablo Rodriguez schrieb: On 07/11/2015 02:32 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: [...] 1. Does the same happen with other fonts in this folder. 2. What happens when you put the fonts in your local TeX directory (or texmf-fonts/fonts/opentype of your context installation). Many thanks for your

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 07/11/2015 05:23 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: [...] It works for me when I use the Postscript files from the txfonts package, you need the following files: Many thanks for your reply, Wolfgang. I wanted to avoid using PostScript files, but it seems that I have to use them. Many thanks

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 07/11/2015 02:32 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: [...] 1. Does the same happen with other fonts in this folder. 2. What happens when you put the fonts in your local TeX directory (or texmf-fonts/fonts/opentype of your context installation). Many thanks for your replies, Thomas and

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 7/11/2015 1:15 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 07/11/2015 10:53 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 7/11/2015 7:17 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: [...] I’m afraid that newotf crashes with this sample: [...] define crashes ... i donwloaded the font, ran mtxrun --generate and remade the font database and

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 7/11/2015 4:27 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 07/11/2015 02:32 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: [...] 1. Does the same happen with other fonts in this folder. 2. What happens when you put the fonts in your local TeX directory (or texmf-fonts/fonts/opentype of your context installation). Many

Re: [NTG-context] new beta - \pushbackground broken

Hello, \pushbackground seems to be broken in the last beta - this doesn't compile (but it did till now): \defineheadalternative [PartAlt] [renderingsetup=set:PartPage] \startsetups[set:PartPage] \startmakeup[mu:PartPage] \white \headnumbercontent \blank[2*big]

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 7/10/2015 7:13 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 07/10/2015 05:05 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On 07/09/2015 03:39 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Of course there will be bugs although the test suite runs without crashing. I will use the new code on my machine but you can test it with:

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 7/10/2015 5:05 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On 07/09/2015 03:39 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Of course there will be bugs although the test suite runs without crashing. I will use the new code on my machine but you can test it with: \usemodule[newotf] before \starttext (or in cont-loc.mkiv). Hi

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 07/11/2015 01:33 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 7/10/2015 5:05 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: [...] resolversmodules 'newotf' is not found i had a typo in the zip maker ... that file is missing (the rest is there) (i've send the file send in another mail to list) Many thanks for the

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 07/09/2015 03:39 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Of course there will be bugs although the test suite runs without crashing. I will use the new code on my machine but you can test it with: \usemodule[newotf] before \starttext (or in cont-loc.mkiv). Hi Hans, did the new font mechanism really make

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 07/10/2015 05:05 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On 07/09/2015 03:39 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Of course there will be bugs although the test suite runs without crashing. I will use the new code on my machine but you can test it with: \usemodule[newotf] before \starttext (or in cont-loc.mkiv).

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Hi Hans, the new beta, 2015.07.10 00:05, messes up punctuation (.:,;) for some fonts like Calluna. This happens with and without \usemodule[newotf]: \definefontfamily [default] [rm] [Calluna]\setupbodyfont [default] \starttext This is not, as it should be; Email: em...@example.net\stoptext

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Note that the || in tufte does not get handled transparently. Alan On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:21:56 +0200 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, I uploaded a beta. The most significant (visible) change is in the way mp

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 6/15/2015 9:22 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: Note that the || in tufte does not get handled transparently. indeed ... not that i worry too much about those special catcodes now (something i'll look at when i need it) Hans -

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, I uploaded a beta. The most significant (visible) change is in the way mp handles outlines. Here are some examples: % outlinetext (text) transformations ; % outlinetext.d (text) (draw options) transformations ; % outlinetext.f

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 5/15/2015 3:58 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Is a sample file required? The files that trigger the bug are rather big and I don’t have the time right now. I hope I can elaborate a minimal file this afternoon. ok, probably only the text around the issue is needed

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 03/07/2014 12:14 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, I uploaded a new beta. Many thanks for it, Hans. The following sample worked (partially) with previous beta: \starttext \startTEXpage[offset=1em] ``---'' `--' \stopTEXpage \stoptext Many thanks for your help, Pablo --

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 03/07/2014 12:14 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, I uploaded a new beta. Hans, I’m afraid I have just found another two issues in the new beta. \setupdirections[bidi=on] \definefontfamily[mainface][serif][FreeSerif] \setupbodyfont[mainface] \starttext \dorecurse{5}{\index{one}A text in

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 3/7/2014 6:17 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 03/07/2014 12:14 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, I uploaded a new beta. Hans, I’m afraid I have just found another two issues in the new beta. \setupdirections[bidi=on] \definefontfamily[mainface][serif][FreeSerif] \setupbodyfont[mainface]

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 3/7/2014 6:17 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: \setupdirections[bidi=on] seems not to work. Removing the command gives the same results. indeed, already for a while i think ... buglet introduced during optimization a while ago (resulting in not enabling) Hans

Re: [NTG-context] new beta luatex error

On 7/31/2013 10:56 PM, Marco Patzer wrote: \starttext foo \stoptext ! LuaTeX error [string \directlua ]:1: attempt to call field 'resetprevdepth' (a nil value) stack traceback: [string \directlua ]:1: in main chunk. not here ... maybe spac-ver.lua has not been updated at your end?

Re: [NTG-context] new beta luatex error

On 2013–07–31 Hans Hagen wrote: On 7/31/2013 10:56 PM, Marco Patzer wrote: \starttext foo \stoptext ! LuaTeX error [string \directlua ]:1: attempt to call field 'resetprevdepth' (a nil value) stack traceback: [string \directlua ]:1: in main chunk. not here ... maybe

Re: [NTG-context] new beta luatex error

On 31 juil. 2013, at 23:43, Marco Patzer home...@lavabit.com wrote: On 2013–07–31 Hans Hagen wrote: On 7/31/2013 10:56 PM, Marco Patzer wrote: \starttext foo \stoptext ! LuaTeX error [string \directlua ]:1: attempt to call field 'resetprevdepth' (a nil value) stack traceback:

Re: [NTG-context] new beta luatex error

On 7/31/2013 11:43 PM, Marco Patzer wrote: On 2013–07–31 Hans Hagen wrote: On 7/31/2013 10:56 PM, Marco Patzer wrote: \starttext foo \stoptext ! LuaTeX error [string \directlua ]:1: attempt to call field 'resetprevdepth' (a nil value) stack traceback: [string \directlua ]:1: in main

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 7/16/2013 11:12 AM, Steffen Kram wrote: Hi all, ligature seems to fail also with beta from 2013.06.10. But with the latest beta, pages start numbering from 2: \starttext \input knuth \stoptext Am I the only one hit by this? I can confirm this, too. Anyone already tracked

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Am 17.07.2013 um 12:23 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: On 7/16/2013 11:12 AM, Steffen Kram wrote: Hi all, ligature seems to fail also with beta from 2013.06.10. But with the latest beta, pages start numbering from 2: \starttext \input knuth \stoptext Am I the only one hit

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Am 17.07.2013 um 12:23 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: On 7/16/2013 11:12 AM, Steffen Kram wrote: Hi all, ligature seems to fail also with beta from 2013.06.10. But with the latest beta, pages start numbering from 2: \starttext \input knuth \stoptext Am I the only one

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Hi all, ligature seems to fail also with beta from 2013.06.10. But with the latest beta, pages start numbering from 2: \starttext \input knuth \stoptext Am I the only one hit by this? I can confirm this, too. Anyone already tracked that down and has a working fix? Thanks,

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

···date: 2013-07-12, Friday···from: Hans Hagen··· Hi, I uploaded a beta. There are not that many changes. Currently I develop in a separate branch but it might be that some changes are reflected in the betas, and hopefully not breaking anything. There a copy’n’paste mistake in

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

···date: 2013-07-12, Friday···from: Hans Hagen··· it might be that some changes are reflected in the betas, and hopefully not breaking anything. Unhappily, it does. In the generic font loader the new “nuts” table is a synonym for “nodes”, but it would appear

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 14/07/13 10:53, Philipp Gesang wrote: ···date: 2013-07-12, Friday···from: Hans Hagen··· it might be that some changes are reflected in the betas, and hopefully not breaking anything. [...] Failing example with ligatures:

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

···date: 2013-07-14, Sunday···from: Pablo Rodríguez··· On 14/07/13 10:53, Philipp Gesang wrote: ···date: 2013-07-12, Friday···from: Hans Hagen··· it might be that some changes are reflected in the betas, and hopefully not breaking anything. [...]

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

···date: 2013-07-14, Sunday···from: Philipp Gesang··· ···date: 2013-07-12, Friday···from: Hans Hagen··· it might be that some changes are reflected in the betas, and hopefully not breaking anything. Unhappily, it does. In the generic font loader the new

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 7/14/2013 10:37 AM, Philipp Gesang wrote: ···date: 2013-07-12, Friday···from: Hans Hagen··· Hi, I uploaded a beta. There are not that many changes. Currently I develop in a separate branch but it might be that some changes are reflected in the betas, and hopefully not breaking anything.

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 13/07/13 03:57, Otared Kavian wrote: On 12 juil. 2013, at 20:06, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote: On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Pablo Rodríguez wrote: On 12/07/13 19:21, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, I uploaded a beta. There are not that many changes. Currently I develop in a separate branch but

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 12/07/13 19:21, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, I uploaded a beta. There are not that many changes. Currently I develop in a separate branch but it might be that some changes are reflected in the betas, and hopefully not breaking anything. Thanks for the new beta, Hans. Could the two bugs with

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Pablo Rodríguez wrote: On 12/07/13 19:21, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, I uploaded a beta. There are not that many changes. Currently I develop in a separate branch but it might be that some changes are reflected in the betas, and hopefully not breaking anything. Thanks for the

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 12 juil. 2013, at 20:06, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote: On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Pablo Rodríguez wrote: On 12/07/13 19:21, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, I uploaded a beta. There are not that many changes. Currently I develop in a separate branch but it might be that some changes are

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 10 avr. 2013, at 20:09, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: Hi, An extra chapter in: http://www.pragma-ade.nl/general/manuals/about.pdf explaining abit the updated math fractions (and math styles mechanism). Hi Hans, Thanks for the explanations given in the above new manual about the

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Otared Kavian ota...@gmail.com wrote: However, on page 27, there is a sentence which I disagree with… You say there: « ConTEXt is always considered somewhat less math savvy than for instance LaTEX », but actually I cannot see any example of maths typesetting

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On Thu, Apr 11 2013, luigi scarso wrote: It's true that ConTEXt is always considered less math savy than LaTeX not that ConTEXt is less math savy than LaTeX. Perhaps better: always - often ? -- Peter

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 4/11/2013 10:15 PM, Peter Münster wrote: On Thu, Apr 11 2013, luigi scarso wrote: It's true that ConTEXt is always considered less math savy than LaTeX not that ConTEXt is less math savy than LaTeX. Perhaps better: always - often ? Ok. Concerning math ... in many aspects the

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Hi, I chucked it in here, for lack of a better place. http://wiki.contextgarden.net/String_Manipulation#String_formatter I don't understand what they whitespace does: I tried to test it with this code, and changing the number did nothing. \starttext \startluacode x = 999

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 3/11/2013 6:13 PM, Sietse Brouwer wrote: I don't understand what they whitespace does: I tried to test it with this code, and changing the number did nothing. for i=0,10 do print(string.formatters(%wsietse,i)) end for i=9,0,-1 do print(string.formatters(%wsietse,i)) end

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 27-7-2012 04:22, Li Yanrui (李延瑞) wrote: 2012/7/27 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: The memory footprint should be somewhat smaller for non cjk usage. (format generation as well as runtime) and the format file is some 10-15% smaller now. The fonts fallback can not work. This is a minmal example:

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 26-7-2012 20:36, Pablo Rodríguez wrote: I'm not sure whether this is important, but http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/qrcs/setup-en.pdf#page=3 contains the date July z, 2012 fixed in next -

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 26/07/12 20:12, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, I uploaded a beta. There is also an updated status-mkiv document: files done644 files todo314 files pending 21 (some day) obsolete2 total 981 So, I have some files to go (mostly lua files) before I pick up the column

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

2012/7/27 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: The memory footprint should be somewhat smaller for non cjk usage. (format generation as well as runtime) and the format file is some 10-15% smaller now. The fonts fallback can not work. This is a minmal example: \definefontsynonym[song][name:adobesongstd]

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 16-7-2012 22:02, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, I uploaded a new beta. The usual fixes. New is a first version of a new multi column handler. Pretty experimental but eventually it will replace the current multi column routine, which is fact is then an instance, think of \definemixedcolumns

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Am 16.07.2012 um 22:02 schrieb Hans Hagen: Hi, I uploaded a new beta. The usual fixes. New is a first version of a new multi column handler. Pretty experimental but eventually it will replace the current multi column routine, which is fact is then an instance, think of

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 16-7-2012 22:30, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: be changed to \unexpanded\def\strc_itemgroups_start_columns {\startmixedcolumns[itemgroupcolumns]} \unexpanded\def\strc_itemgroups_stop_columns {\stopmixedcolumns} because “start” and “stop” are interface/language dependant strings. Ok. I

Re: [NTG-context] new beta 2012.07.09 22:35 failing

On 9-7-2012 23:40, Meer, H. van der wrote: This is beta: ConTeXt ver: 2012.07.09 22:35 MKIV fmt: 2012.7.9 int: english/english It fails me with (see below). I am fairly sure now this must be an error seeing the minimal example provided. Here is the most minimal example I could concoct:

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 19:47, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: I uploaded a new beta. This time a couple of fixes + some reorganization of font related code. More to follow. There's something fishy somewhere in the fonts or the simplefonts module, because a file that worked last week now gets

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 17-1-2012 09:08, Mari Voipio wrote: On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 19:47, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote: I uploaded a new beta. This time a couple of fixes + some reorganization of font related code. More to follow. There's something fishy somewhere in the fonts or the simplefonts module,

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Am 01.01.2012 um 03:39 schrieb Li Yanrui (李延瑞): 2011/12/31 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: Hi, I uploaded a new beta. As I'm still in cleaning-up mode, the usual problems could show up as quite some code was adapted (moved around). For those interested there is a file 'status-mkiv' that can be

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Has the following been found and corrected? \definetypeface [\typescriptone] [tt] [mono] [cursor] [default]argument \@tlstyle argument \@tlstyle \dousestyleparameter ...\currentstyleparameter {#1

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Am 31.12.2011 um 13:58 schrieb Meer, H. van der: Has the following been found and corrected? \definetypeface [\typescriptone] [tt] [mono] [cursor] [default]argument \@tlstyle argument \@tlstyle \dousestyleparameter ...\currentstyleparameter {#1

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

2011/12/31 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl: Hi, I uploaded a new beta. As I'm still in cleaning-up mode, the usual problems could show up as quite some code was adapted (moved around). For those interested there is a file 'status-mkiv' that can be run to get an overview of where we stand. One big

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Am 2011-12-22 um 14:55 schrieb Hans Hagen: This version might also solve some of the reported problems with page imposition (as the page-* modules are being cleaned up buglets cna be introduced .. nothing really changes there apart from speedup and namespacing). typing (\starttyping)

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Another problem: interactive links appear to be broken with the latest beta. This works with 2011.09.20, but not with the latest: \setupinteraction [state=start, color=darkblue] \useURL[luatex][http://www.luatex.org][][luatex website] \starttext Does this work? \from[luatex]

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 3-10-2011 12:42, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Another problem: interactive links appear to be broken with the latest beta. This works with 2011.09.20, but not with the latest: \setupinteraction [state=start, color=darkblue] \useURL[luatex][http://www.luatex.org][][luatex website] \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 10/01/2011 11:16 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, I uploaded a new beta. Apart from some fixes the following has been added/changed. Some are side effects of discussions at the context meeting. However, the biggest new thing is adapted cross document referencing. This was already possible but we

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 2-10-2011 18:16, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: the cross-referencing is excellent new, I will have to play with it very soon! In the meantime, here's something which broke with the October beta (worked a week ago): fixed (just a forgotten low level rename) Hans

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 10/02/2011 10:59 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 2-10-2011 18:16, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: the cross-referencing is excellent new, I will have to play with it very soon! In the meantime, here's something which broke with the October beta (worked a week ago): fixed (just a forgotten low level

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

list for ConTeXt usersntg-context@ntg.nl Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users ntg-context@ntg.nl Subject: Re: [NTG-context] new beta On 10/01/2011 11:16 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, I uploaded a new beta. Apart from some fixes the following has been added/changed. Some are side effects

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 28-1-2011 6:55, Alan BRASLAU wrote: Hans, Typing the full path name (in response to the prompt) satisfies the program, and the installation process proceeds. Mistyping the file name causes the prompt to be repeated, so I assume that the file is indeed there. ok, but is it mentioned in the

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 26-1-2011 3:31, Alan BRASLAU wrote: Here is a log. Notice the instances of Please type another input file name: In your log we find: resolvers: scanning path '/usr/local/context/beta/tex/texmf-context' resolvers: category 'files', cachename

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Hans, Typing the full path name (in response to the prompt) satisfies the program, and the installation process proceeds. Mistyping the file name causes the prompt to be repeated, so I assume that the file is indeed there. Alan On Thursday 27 January 2011 22:43:09 Hans Hagen wrote: On

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 26-1-2011 8:50, Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Tuesday 18 January 2011 20:13:36 Renaud AUBIN wrote: Hi Hans, On Linux with debian minimals: l.42 \loadmarkfile{catc-ini} Please type another input file name: ! Emergency stop. to be read again \relax l.42 \loadmarkfile{catc-ini}

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 25-1-2011 9:18, Marco Pessotto wrote: Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl writes: - If you are adventurous you can add the following to cont-new.mkiv \enablemode[*nofonts] This will postpone font loading and will be default soon. This saves runtime when you use another font than latin

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:26:18 +0100 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 26-1-2011 8:50, Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Tuesday 18 January 2011 20:13:36 Renaud AUBIN wrote: Hi Hans, On Linux with debian minimals: l.42 \loadmarkfile{catc-ini} Please type another input file name: ! Emergency stop. to

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl writes: On 25-1-2011 9:18, Marco Pessotto wrote: Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl writes: - If you are adventurous you can add the following to cont-new.mkiv \enablemode[*nofonts] This will postpone font loading and will be default soon. This saves runtime when

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

On 26-1-2011 9:41, Thomas Schmitz wrote: On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:26:18 +0100 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 26-1-2011 8:50, Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Tuesday 18 January 2011 20:13:36 Renaud AUBIN wrote: Hi Hans, On Linux with debian minimals: l.42 \loadmarkfile{catc-ini} Please type

Re: [NTG-context] new beta

so, the main question is: why isn't mtxrun --generate run? It is run. But this has been broken since the very beginning. When you run mtxrun --generate from withit mtx-update in creates a different database and updates that one (at least that used to be a problem in past; I didn't check that

  1   2   3   4   5   >