Am 23.03.2009 um 01:49 schrieb Diego Depaoli:
Hi all,
before start spend my time, can Context handle 6 (or 8) columns on a
70X100 cm papersize?
yes, and if it's about a poster, just use columnsets then
many thanks, it works
However I get a weird behaviour.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 23.03.2009 um 01:49 schrieb Diego Depaoli:
Hi all,
before start spend my time, can Context handle 6 (or 8) columns on a
70X100 cm papersize?
yes, and if it's about a poster, just use columnsets
Hi all,
before start spend my time, can Context handle 6 (or 8) columns on a
70X100 cm papersize?
Cheers
--
Diego Depaoli
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
Hello,
I have problems with scaling of big png images. Scaling works ok with
XeTeX, but fails with both pdfTeX and LuaTeX, so it might be a problem
in the engine, not necessary in ConTeXt. The image comes out with
several cm white border when it should occupy the whole page.
Here are the testing
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Mojca Miklavec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have problems with scaling of big png images. Scaling works ok with
XeTeX, but fails with both pdfTeX and LuaTeX, so it might be a problem
in the engine, not necessary in ConTeXt. The image comes out
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I have problems with scaling of big png images. Scaling works ok with
XeTeX, but fails with both pdfTeX and LuaTeX, so it might be a problem
in the engine, not necessary in ConTeXt. The image comes out
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I have problems with scaling of big png images. Scaling works ok with
XeTeX, but fails with both pdfTeX and LuaTeX, so it might be a problem
in the engine, not necessary in ConTeXt. The image comes out with
several cm white border when it should occupy the whole
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I have problems with scaling of big png images. Scaling works ok with
XeTeX, but fails with both pdfTeX and LuaTeX, so it might be a problem
in the engine, not necessary in ConTeXt. The image comes out with
several cm white border when it should occupy
Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
The problem is only with Lucida fonts.
___
If your question is
Le 29 août 08 à 08:59, Wolfgang Schuster a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
The problem is
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
The problem is only with Lucida fonts.
This is *not* Latin/Computer
installation are right.
Which TFM do you use?
Please follow http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2008/033517.html.
big braces are working fine on my documents.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well
This is of course Lucida Expert fonts.
(The quality of the image is not so good, because I cannot upload
large attachments. that's it.)
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
Are you sure? see the first line of the
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
The problem is only with Lucida fonts.
This
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
It seems that the text you
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.
s/sent/send/g
btw, Taco, the attachment restriction (40k) is too stirct...
t.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
t.tex
Description: TeX document
OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 29 août
Hi,
Yue Wang wrote:
This is of course Lucida Expert fonts.
(The quality of the image is not so good, because I cannot upload
large attachments. that's it.)
What does your typescript look like? Lucida Expert may not be the
same as the Lucida Bright fonts from TUG (previously YandY).
Best
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with
lucida.
I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says
**
\def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{8.20}}
\def\LBRBig {\@@dobig
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Yue Wang wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.
s/sent/send/g
Thank you. Now I no longer understand why Eric got wrong output :(
btw, Taco, the attachment restriction (40k) is too stirct...
I
and math-tex)
Then the braces are gigantic big...
please have a check if this is the cause -_-
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yue Wang wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.
s/sent/send
Yue Wang wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.
s/sent/send/g
Thank you. Now I no longer understand why Eric got wrong output :(
btw, Taco, the attachment restriction (40k) is too stirct...
I do not think we can enlarge
Le 29 août 08 à 12:00, Yue Wang a écrit :
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with
lucida.
I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says
**
\def
oh, I made a another mistake. I mean __complete__ set (not basic set)
font from TUG:)
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Yue Wang wrote:
This is of course Lucida Expert fonts.
(The quality of the image is not so good, because I cannot upload
large
Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with
lucida.
I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says
Hello
The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with
lucida.
I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says
**
\def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{8.20}}
\def\LBRBig {\@@dobig{10.80}}
\def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{13.42}}
\def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{16.03}}
\def
Consider an example like the following:
\definestartstop
[extract]
[style=small]
\starttext
\startextract
As you can see, the $M$ Math is too big.
\stopextract
\stoptext
When typeset, the math M is bigger than the capital M in Math following
it. What might be going
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:05:00 -0800
Jesse Alama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
\definestartstop
[extract]
[style=small]
[style=smallbodyfont]
\starttext
\startextract
As you can see, the $M$ Math is too big.
\stopextract
\stoptext
Greetings,
Wolfgang
Hello,
Excuse me, but what 'big' stands for in \blank[big]?
Every time I use it, I expect really big white space, but get only hardly
noticeable one.
Best regards,
Vaytcheslav
___
If your question is of interest
2007/11/7, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
Excuse me, but what 'big' stands for in \blank[big]?
Every time I use it, I expect really big white space, but get only hardly
noticeable one.
Best regards,
Vaytcheslav
From core-spa:
% In earlier versions \type{\bigskipamount
:
\definebodyfontenvironment
[12pt]
[\s!text=12pt,\s!script=9pt,\s!scriptscript=7pt,
\c!x=10pt,\c!xx=8pt,\c!big=14pt,\c!small=10pt]
So one would expect that switching to a big bodyfont will result in a
fontsize of 14pt. But when I typeset the next file:
\usetypescriptfile[type-adobe
best compare two 10 page docs and two 100 page docs
The best rate I got is in a scientific pubblication with many formulas.
LaTeX: 60 pages (260 kb)
ConTeXt: 61 pages (478 kb)
Instead under Linux (TeTeX) the size is almost the same.
jk
--
Jilani KHALDI
http://jkhaldi.oltrelinux.com
Jilani Khaldi wrote:
best compare two 10 page docs and two 100 page docs
The best rate I got is in a scientific pubblication with many formulas.
LaTeX: 60 pages (260 kb)
ConTeXt: 61 pages (478 kb)
Instead under Linux (TeTeX) the size is almost the same.
so what do you use otherwise
so what do you use otherwise (instead of tetex)?
Under Linux (Slackware 10.2) I have only TeTeX:
pdftex = This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4)
pdflatex = This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4)
Under Windows (2000 Pro) using MikTeX:
pdftex = This is
Jilani Khaldi wrote:
I see that the PDF generated by MiKTeX (the bigger one) looks a little
better than the one generated by TeTeX. So I understand now why this
difference between their sizes.
Can you make an entry in the wiki summarizing this?
Hans
I have translated some docs from LaTeX to ConTeXt and I found that the
PDF files generated by ConTeXt are almost 3 times bigger than the ones
generated by LaTeX (*). Why all this difference?
jk
(*) MikTeX under Windows
--
Jilani KHALDI
http://jkhaldi.oltrelinux.com
David Arnold wrote:
Hans, Taco,
Any news on releasing source for the big manuals?
no news, but it will happen
Hans
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Hans, Taco,
Any news on releasing source for the big manuals?
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
박내엽 wrote:
Blow is my sample
i can not compiled becuse \startitemize[1,packed] line
but \startitemize[n, packed] is good and i want item 1(cdot)
separator in higher text then 22pt
Your example works ok here (ConTeXt 2005.06.27)
Greetings, Taco
pt,24pt,28pt] [Dotum,rm,ss,tt,mm] [default]\setupbodyfont[24pt]
\starttext\title{\midaligned{Title}}
braabrabrabarbarbarbarbarabrabra
\startitemize[1, packed] \item item one \item item two\stopitemize
\stoptext
--
ps: old context version was good fo
101 - 140 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
