macros are – then we should forget about
MkLX mode?
i meant 'if supported by the engine' but mklx are only named when you
define them adnm internalized as #1 ...
Did I understand correctly, that bracketed = optional parameters is just
a convention, i.e. only the handling of arguments
-macros, at least tried to…):
While I liked \define, it looks like it just doesn’t make sense anymore
if I need (\tolerant)\def for anything advanced anyway?
You stress how costly named macros are – then we should forget about
MkLX mode?
Did I understand correctly, that bracketed = optional
the explanation!
I guess you meant \tolerant instead of \optional?
yes, (i sometimes localy uise that as aliasm, sorry) .. consider that
you just past the examn
Did you know that we can have #A..#E as well. So 15 parameters instead
of 9? I still need to use that more (deep down).
That I kne
nstead of \optional?
Did you know that we can have #A..#E as well. So 15 parameters instead
of 9? I still need to use that more (deep down).
That I knew. At least in mkvi/mklx mode.
If I use even 4 params I lose count of them.
Don't worry, you don't want to know what I forget.
Sure.
ewFile,BufRead *.latex,*.sty,*.dtx,*.ltx,*.bbl setf tex
"au BufNewFile,BufRead *.texcall dist#ft#FTtex()
and instead adding
" ConTeXt
au BufNewFile,BufRead *.tex,*.ctx,*.mkii,*.mkiv,*.mkvi,*.mkxl,*.mklx setf
context
It works for Me who only using context as a ty
ne 315
>
> wiped cache; run mtxrun --generate without problems; but context --make has
> this error.
>
> Do I miss something?
>
> Thanks
> Christian
>
> Am Mo., 23. Nov. 2020 um 18:56 Uhr schrieb Hans Hagen :
> Hi,
>
> I uploaded a next iteration of lmtx. F
mething?
Thanks
Christian
Am Mo., 23. Nov. 2020 um 18:56 Uhr schrieb Hans Hagen :
> Hi,
>
> I uploaded a next iteration of lmtx. From now on there are dedicated sub
> directories for mklx and mpxl, which is an indication that we&#
On 11/23/20 6:55 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I uploaded a next iteration of lmtx. From now on there are dedicated sub
> directories for mklx and mpxl, which is an indication that we're on the
> way to a full code split.
Hi Hans,
I’m afraid that there is an error that prev
Hi,
I uploaded a next iteration of lmtx. From now on there are dedicated sub
directories for mklx and mpxl, which is an indication that we're on the
way to a full code split.
> Since there are already *.mkxl files in the ConTeXt distribution, I
> > think it may make sense to name the LMTX version MkXL.
> >
> > In any case, MkXL is simpler and clearer that MkIV with LMTX.
> mkiv (four) : files that expect mkiv (or lmtx)
> mkvi (
r that MkIV with LMTX.
mkiv (four) : files that expect mkiv (or lmtx)
mkvi (six): mkiv (or lmtx) files that pass a filter
mkxl (fourty) : files that expect lmtx
mklx (sixty) : lmtx files that pass a filter
(there are some more, like template files and so)
I suppose that latex syntax high
11 matches
Mail list logo
