Hi,
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 2:21 PM fv leung wrote:
>
> I have a formula involving \overparent to be typeset in kpfonts and concrete.
>
> There is no problem with kpfonts. But the \overparent in concrete is just too
> high. I can adjust the position with [distance=-1ex] . Is the
I have a formula involving \overparent to be typeset in kpfonts and concrete.
There is no problem with kpfonts. But the \overparent in concrete is just too
high. I can adjust the position with [distance=-1ex] . Is there a better way to
adjust the position? Like using goodies (don't kno
On 9/21/2023 10:26 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2023, Mikael Sundqvist wrote:
Nice with offset=auto. It is not clear to me what the intent/meaning
is of the original example, but one can also try the 23DC (can extend
as \overparent):
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/128625
On Thu, 21 Sep 2023, Mikael Sundqvist wrote:
> Nice with offset=auto. It is not clear to me what the intent/meaning
> is of the original example, but one can also try the 23DC (can extend
> as \overparent):
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/128625/how-to-put-smallsmile-or-smallfro
\fi
>
> and someplace
>
> \definesystemconstant {base}
>
> (a patching exercise)
>
> Hans
Nice with offset=auto. It is not clear to me what the intent/meaning
is of the original example, but one can also try the 23DC (can extend
as \overparent):
\definemathtopaccent[t
>\fenced[brace][size=2]{x_2} =
>\fenced[brace][size=3]{x_3} =
>\fenced[brace][size=4]{x_4} =
>\fenced[brace]{\blackrule[width=1cm,height=1cm]}
>}
>
>\im{
>\root[4]{1+x^2+a} +
>\frac{1}{1+x^2+a} +
>\ov
[size=1]{x_1} =
\fenced[brace][size=2]{x_2} =
\fenced[brace][size=3]{x_3} =
\fenced[brace][size=4]{x_4} =
\fenced[brace]{\blackrule[width=1cm,height=1cm]}
}
\im{
\root[4]{1+x^2+a} +
\frac{1}{1+x^2+a} +
\overparent{1+x^2+a} +
rnative=mp]
\setupmathstackers
[bottom]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\starttext
$\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+
Try:
\m{\overparent{}{AB}}
(See section 1 Math Stackers in about.pdf, in the distribution.)
Alan
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 22:07:37 +0200
Fabrice Couvreur wrote:
> I just tested both solutions and that of Alan does not work as expected.
>
> \useMPlibrary[mat]
>
> \definemaths
I just tested both solutions and that of Alan does not work as expected.
\useMPlibrary[mat]
\definemathstackers
[mp]
[alternative=mp]
\definemathextensible [mp] [overparent] ["FE3DC]
\starttext
\m{\overparent{ AB}}
\stoptext
Le jeu. 27 sept. 2018 à 21:47, Fabrice Couvreur
a
ation of an arc ?
> > > Thank you
> > > Fabrice
> > >
> >
> > Use the correct math fence
> >
> > \starttext
> > \m{\overparent{\rm AB}}
> > \stoptext
> >
> > > \starttext
> > > \m{\overset{\frown}{\rm AB
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 09:22:00 +1200
Henri Menke wrote:
> On 27/09/18 09:15, Fabrice Couvreur wrote:
> > Hello,
> > How to improve the notation of an arc ?
> > Thank you
> > Fabrice
> >
>
> Use the correct math fence
>
> \starttext
> \m{\o
On 27/09/18 09:15, Fabrice Couvreur wrote:
> Hello,
> How to improve the notation of an arc ?
> Thank you
> Fabrice
>
Use the correct math fence
\starttext
\m{\overparent{\rm AB}}
\stoptext
> \starttext
> \m{\overset{\frown}
I guess I'll just ignore it and carry on.
! Extra tokens will be flushed.
(
<*> math_stacker_draw(
math_stacker_leftarrow_shape) ; ;
I've just read as much of that statement as I could fathom,
so a semicolon should have been next. It's very puzzling...
but I'll try to get
thstackers
[top]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\setupmathstackers
[bottom]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\starttext
$\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+
thstackers
[bottom]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\starttext
$\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \
et the name in
ConTeXt. But in many
cases the names from unimath-symbols also work in ConTeXt.
>
> Thanx again.
> Jaroslav Hajtmar
>
>
> Dne 02.07.17 9:46, ntg-context za uživatele Henri Menke
enrime...@gmail.com> napsal(a)
, ntg-context za uživatele Henri Menke
> enrime...@gmail.com> napsal(a):
>
> $\overparent{AVB}$
>
>
> Dne 02.07.17 9:46, ntg-context za uživatele Henri Menke
> enrime...@gmail.com> napsal(a):
>
> On 07/02/2017 07:18 PM, Jaroslav Hajtmar wrote:
> &
apsal(a):
$\overparent{AVB}$
Dne 02.07.17 9:46, ntg-context za uživatele Henri Menke
napsal(a):
On 07/02/2017 07:18 PM, Jaroslav Hajtmar wrote:
> Hello ConTeXist.
>
> Can someone advise me how to lay an arc over three letters AVB.
>
> It's abou
ri Menke
> napsal(a):
> $\overparent{AVB}$
Dne 02.07.17 9:46, ntg-context za uživatele Henri Menke
napsal(a):
On 07/02/2017 07:18 PM, Jaroslav Hajtmar wrote:
> Hello ConTeXist.
>
> Can someone advise me how to lay an arc over three letters AVB.
>
On 07/02/2017 07:18 PM, Jaroslav Hajtmar wrote:
> Hello ConTeXist.
>
> Can someone advise me how to lay an arc over three letters AVB.
>
> It's about the LaTeX equivalent of \overarc or \widearc macro. Is there any
> table of similar ConTeXt symbols?
Maybe like this?
\
=darkred,
>alternative=mp]
>
> \setupmathstackers
> [bottom]
> [color=darkred,
>alternative=mp]
>
> \starttext
>
> $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
> \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
> $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad
+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d}
\stopMPextensions
>
> \startuniqueMPgraphic{math:stacker:\number"2190}
> math_stacker_draw(math_stacker_leftarrow_shape) ;
> \stopuniqueMPgraphic
>
> \startuniqueMPgraphic{math:stacker:\number"2192}
> math_stacker_draw(math_stacker_rightarrow_shape) ;
> \stopu
or=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\setupmathstackers
[bottom]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\starttext
$\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Xan wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just want to make an arc to a word. I found that
> > [http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/15468/frown-and-mathop-stackrel-overset]
> > but it's LaTeX or XeTeX centric.
> >
> > Is t
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Xan wrote:
Hi,
I just want to make an arc to a word. I found that
[http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/15468/frown-and-mathop-stackrel-overset]
but it's LaTeX or XeTeX centric.
Is there any equivalent in ConTeXt?
$\overparent{MMM}$
A
spects of open type math that
still inherits old stuff) so in a next version you can do this:
\setupmathstackers[vfenced][hoffset=10pt]
is it looks like these commands have built-in \limits, these are now set
for
\overbrace
\overparent
\overbracket
\overbar
\underbrace
\underparent
\underbrack
; http://www.tug.org/store/lucida/otmath-blocks.pdf
>
> and see the result? Or find the name to use in a math $ \symbolname $
> environment?
\setupbodyfont[lucidaot]
\starttext
$\underparent{ABC}\overparent{XYZ}$
\stoptext
Wolfgang
___
29 matches
Mail list logo
