phs
Command/ note
Command/ ornament
Command/ paragraphs
Command/ placecombinedlist
Command/ placefloat
Command/ placelistoffloats
Command/ placelistofsorts
Command/ placelistofsynonyms
Command/ placement
Command/ placepairedbox
Command/ placeregister
Command/ presetlabeltext
Command/ referenceformat
Hi,
I’m not sure if this is the intended behaviour of the system, but I want to
typeset “This is Figure 1.1 in Chapter A Good Story” in the attached minimal
example. However, setting up the referencing interaction to text, this typesets
“This is 1.1 in Chapter A Good Story”. The same holds true
Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 9-8-2010 9:17, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>> Hans Hagen wrote:
>>
>>> On 9-8-2010 12:22, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>>>
> \NC \in [x] \NC \in {left}[x] \NC \in {}{right}[x] \NC \in
> {left}{right}[x] \NC \NR
I see no "left" or "right" in the firs
On 9-8-2010 9:17, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
On 9-8-2010 12:22, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
\NC \in [x] \NC \in {left}[x] \NC \in {}{right}[x] \NC \in
{left}{right}[x] \NC \NR
I see no "left" or "right" in the first string in PDF output. Just
"1\t1\t1\t1".
Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 9-8-2010 12:22, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>
>>> \NC \in [x] \NC \in {left}[x] \NC \in {}{right}[x] \NC \in
>>> {left}{right}[x] \NC \NR
>> I see no "left" or "right" in the first string in PDF output. Just
>> "1\t1\t1\t1".
>
> sure, as \in has no left and
On 9-8-2010 12:22, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
\NC \in [x] \NC \in {left}[x] \NC \in {}{right}[x] \NC \in
{left}{right}[x] \NC \NR
I see no "left" or "right" in the first string in PDF output. Just
"1\t1\t1\t1".
sure, as \in has no left and right (nor a setup)
Am 09.08.10 00:22, schrieb Yury G. Kudryashov:
I see no "left" or "right" in the first string in PDF output. Just
"1\t1\t1\t1".
Try it again later, it takes always a while till the beta is in the
minimals.
Other strings work as expected except for "~" in text= field. In the earlier
versions
Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 8-8-2010 7:40, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>
>>> this is only one case (we also need labels, content, left and right to
>>> work ok)
>
> I uploaded a beta that handles the following as intended.
>
> \starttext
>
> \definereferenceformat [intesta] [left=(,right=),text=Whate
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8-8-2010 7:40, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
> this is only one case (we also need labels, content, left and right to
> work ok)
I uploaded a beta that handles the following as intended.
Can you also add a style and color key to \definereferenceformat
On 8-8-2010 7:40, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
this is only one case (we also need labels, content, left and right to
work ok)
I uploaded a beta that handles the following as intended.
\starttext
\definereferenceformat [intesta] [left=(,right=),text=Whatever~]
\definereferenceformat [intestb] [
Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 8-8-2010 7:19, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>> Hans Hagen wrote:
>>
>>> On 8-8-2010 2:44, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
The following code:
\definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma]
\inlem[lem:mylemma]
produces just a number, no "Lemma " pr
On 8-8-2010 7:19, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8-8-2010 2:44, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
The following code:
\definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma]
\inlem[lem:mylemma]
produces just a number, no "Lemma " prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it a
while ago. Could you please
Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 8-8-2010 2:44, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> The following code:
>>
>> \definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma]
>> \inlem[lem:mylemma]
>>
>> produces just a number, no "Lemma " prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it a
>> while ago. Could you please apply it, or tell me
On 8-8-2010 2:44, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
The following code:
\definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma]
\inlem[lem:mylemma]
produces just a number, no "Lemma " prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it a
while ago. Could you please apply it, or tell me why you don't want to apply
it?
because i
Hi!
The following code:
\definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma]
\inlem[lem:mylemma]
produces just a number, no "Lemma " prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it a
while ago. Could you please apply it, or tell me why you don't want to apply
it?
--
Yury G. Kudryashov--- a/tex/texmf-context/tex/cont
taco wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>> Another problem fixed by my patch:
>>
>> \definereferenceformat[ineq][text=equation]
>> \starttext
>> \placeformula[first]
>> \startformula 1=1\stopformula
>> \ineq[first]
>> \stoptext
>> printed "1", not "equation 1".
>
> This problem is st
yes we have. At next ctx meeting i will show something.(post from mobile sorry)
On 6/5/10, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Are there any automatic unit test for ConTeXt distribution? At least the bug
> with referenceformat can be catched using something like
>
> contex
Hi!
Are there any automatic unit test for ConTeXt distribution? At least the bug
with referenceformat can be catched using something like
context test
pdftotext test.pdf test.txt
diff test.txt test.txt-good
And the bug with broken footnote can be catched using just "context test".
taco wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>>> It seems that \ineq doesn't clear some variables, and the next \in uses
>>> the previous format.
>> Please, apply the attached patch upstream. It fixed the problem for me.
> This problem was already fixed in the latest (internal?) beta.
I shall
Hi,
Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
It seems that \ineq doesn't clear some variables, and the next \in uses
the previous format.
Please, apply the attached patch upstream. It fixed the problem for me.
This problem was already fixed in the latest (internal?) beta.
Another problem fixed by my pa
Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I try the following:
>
> \definereferenceformat[ineq][left=(,right=),text=Equation]
> \starttext
> \placeformula[first]
> \startformula
> 2=2
> \stopformula
> In \in[first] ineq \ineq[first] in \in[first].
> \stoptext
>
> The result is:
> 2 = 2 (1)
> In 1 ine
Hi!
I try the following:
\definereferenceformat[ineq][left=(,right=),text=Equation]
\starttext
\placeformula[first]
\startformula
2=2
\stopformula
In \in[first] ineq \ineq[first] in \in[first].
\stoptext
The result is:
2 = 2 (1)
In 1 ineq (1) in (1).
It seems that \ineq doesn't clear some varia
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> \def\myin[#1:#2]{
>\expandafter\ifx\csname in#1\endcsname\relax
> \writestatus{warning}{referenceformat in#1 not defined}
> \in[#1:#2]
>\else
> \csname in#1\endcsname[#1:#2]
>\fi}
And if you want to sup
igure}[fig:fig_ref]
> - \in{(}{)}[eq_eq_ref] (but there is an extra h space just after "(" )
> - \in{section}[sec_sec_ref]
Here is a very simple mechanism, I do not take
care of all the bells and whistles [1] of \in.
\def\myin[#1:#2]{
\expandafter\ifx\csname in#1\endcsname\relax
\wr
24 matches
Mail list logo