[NTG-context] barring changes

2022-07-28 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
\underrandom doesn’t work \underrandoms doesn’t work \overbar works, but not in TABLE \overbars works \overstrike works, but not in TABLE \overstrikes works \understrike works, but not in TABLE \understrikes works The nested example \overbar{Über} \underbar{Unterstrich \underbar{steigt

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

2016-02-15 Thread Hans Hagen
\underrandoms{test me}} and \underrandom{test} or \underrandom{grep} \blank test {\red\underdashes {test me}} and \underdash {test} or \underdash {grep} \blank test {\red\underdots {test me}} and \underdot {test} or \underdot {grep} \blank How do you change the thickness of the dots (i.e., set

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

2016-02-15 Thread Hans Hagen
\underrandoms{test me}} and \underrandom{test} or \underrandom{grep} \blank test {\red\underdashes {test me}} and \underdash {test} or \underdash {grep} \blank test {\red\underdots {test me}} and \underdot {test} or \underdot {grep} \blank still somewhat experimental While you are looking

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

2016-02-15 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Hans Hagen wrote: On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote: I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the | \defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible? i uploaded a beta where you can test: test {\red\underrandoms{test me}} and \underrandom{test

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

2016-02-15 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Hans Hagen wrote: On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote: I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the | \defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible? i uploaded a beta where you can test: test {\red\underrandoms{test me}} and \underrandom{test

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

2016-02-15 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/15/2016 9:31 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Hans, Thanks for this new nice feature! However it seems to me that \underdashes produces dots under ords, while \underdots produces dashes… Is it on purpose? no, will be fixed in next beta Also the name \underrandoms seems misleading too. i

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

2016-02-15 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Hans, Thanks for this new nice feature! However it seems to me that \underdashes produces dots under ords, while \underdots produces dashes… Is it on purpose? Also the name \underrandoms seems misleading too. Best regards: OK > On 15 Feb 2016, at 10:39, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl&

Re: [NTG-context] How can I define a dotted underbar in ConTeXt?

2016-02-15 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/10/2016 10:14 PM, Laurent d'Airsy wrote: I would like to create a dotted underbar in ConTeXt with the |\defineunderbar|mechanism. Is that possible? i uploaded a beta where you can test: test {\red\underrandoms{test me}} and \underrandom{test} or \underrandom{grep} \blank test {\red