On 11/23/2013 8:25 PM, Renaud Aubin wrote:
Le 23/11/2013 19:08, Wolfgang Schuster a écrit :
Am 23.11.2013 um 18:51 schrieb Renaud Aubin r...@renaud.io:
Hi folks,
I'm working on a Roboto typescript and starting from the work done by
Zen Lima back in last July, I would like to push things
Am 22.11.2013 um 18:08 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com:
Am 22.11.2013 um 05:00 schrieb Rik amphib...@gmail.com:
Fallbacks (at least the range I tested) do not work with the roman face of
Linux Libertine O in the new (core) simplefonts implementation. I first
Hello together,
I have an arabic font, which is quite perfect, but only a little bit too
thin, so that it seems to vanish into the white of the paper.
Unfortunately this font does not come with an bold-variant.
Now I tried to manipulate it with CorelDraw, just converted into curves
and
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 2:01 PM, H. Özoguz h.oezo...@mmnetz.de wrote:
Now the question: I obviously cant set the entire book (more than 600 pages)
with Corel-Draw, and want too use ConText, of course. So is there a way to
produce this boldness out of this too thin font within ConText, too?
May be ConTeXt experts would have better suggestions, till then you
may want to look at the fake bold option in simplefonts -
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Simplefonts#Faking_italics_and_bold_fonts
Thanks for your advice.
Unfortunately I did not manish to work with this font by simplefonts. I
Hi Hans,
Thank you for the review and your suggestions!
Le 24/11/2013 12:53, Hans Hagen a écrit :
normally typescripts like that end up in tex/context/third (maybe at
some point we can collect extra typescripts in one package)
https://github.com/nibua-r/roboto-context/issues/1
Extra
Am 24.11.2013 um 12:53 schrieb Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl:
Any chance that this typescript could find a way to the main ConTeXt distro?
normally typescripts like that end up in tex/context/third (maybe at some
point we can collect extra typescripts in one package)
I can add it to my
Am 24.11.2013 um 15:32 schrieb H. Özoguz h.oezo...@mmnetz.de:
May be ConTeXt experts would have better suggestions, till then you
may want to look at the fake bold option in simplefonts -
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Simplefonts#Faking_italics_and_bold_fonts
Thanks for your advice.
Hello there,
I wonder why working with fonts is soo hard in ConText (much easier in
Word or CorelDraw).
See this following font (free, opensource):
http://fonts.qurancomplex.gov.sa/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/UthmanTN1-Ver10.zip
And try now this Context-Code:
To be more concrete, I added an jpeg from CorelDraw, which shows, what I
mean with these little signs above the letters. They are vanished in
ConText, but are correctly set in CorelDraw with the very same font.
Huseyin
attachment:
On 11/24/2013 4:41 PM, H. Özoguz wrote:
Hello there,
I wonder why working with fonts is soo hard in ConText (much easier in
Word or CorelDraw).
See this following font (free, opensource):
http://fonts.qurancomplex.gov.sa/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/UthmanTN1-Ver10.zip
And try now this
May be ConTeXt experts would have better suggestions, till then you
may want to look at the fake bold option in simplefonts -
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Simplefonts#Faking_italics_and_bold_fonts
Thanks for your advice.
Unfortunately I did not manish to work with this font by
Am 24.11.2013 um 18:12 schrieb H. Özoguz h.oezo...@mmnetz.de:
May be ConTeXt experts would have better suggestions, till then you
may want to look at the fake bold option in simplefonts -
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Simplefonts#Faking_italics_and_bold_fonts
Thanks for your
On 11/24/2013 6:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
shows me a little sign above the word
the only issue i see is that this otf font has 2048 units and gets
scaled wrong (in luatex's backend probably)
definefont[arabica][file:uthmantn1-ver10.otf*arabic at 45pt]
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/24/2013 6:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
shows me a little sign above the word
the only issue i see is that this otf font has 2048 units and gets scaled
wrong (in luatex's backend probably)
It is actually a TTF font but the
On 11/24/2013 6:38 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/24/2013 6:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
shows me a little sign above the word
the only issue i see is that this otf font has 2048 units and gets scaled
wrong (in luatex's backend
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:48:05PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/24/2013 6:38 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/24/2013 6:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
shows me a little sign above the word
the only issue i see is that this otf font has
The extend feature stretches the glyphs to get narrow or wide font but it
doesn’t embolden it.
The best solution is to get a font with a real bold style, money shouldn’t be a
problem because fonts are cheap nowadays.
Wolfgang
Thanks, I hoped the it could really embold ist (like I did it in
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:52:31PM +0100, H. Özoguz wrote:
The extend feature stretches the glyphs to get narrow or wide font but it
doesn’t embolden it.
The best solution is to get a font with a real bold style, money shouldn’t
be a problem because fonts are cheap nowadays.
Wolfgang
On 11/24/2013 6:50 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:48:05PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/24/2013 6:38 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/24/2013 6:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
shows me a little sign above the word
the
not at all, as you show way more input here as in the jpeg ... so first
make a minimal example
I did gave a min-example, didn't I? The JPG was only to make clear, what
I mean with little signs. Is that clear now? Dont know how to say it
better way (sorry my english) :),
also another font
Dear All,
is it possible to get the complete representation of the layout that is
processed in the luatex PDF generator?
I mean coordinations of individual text boxes, their dimensions etc.
In e.g. XSL-FO processors it is provided in the XML based formats:
http://amirifont.org/
/ - and more hard to find such a find in this style (Uthmanic).
/
There is no such a style, it is just a simplified (dumbed down) Naskh
style used only in one single Mushaf. Why is that a requirement?
Thanks Khaled,
the Naskh-Style is not an absolute requirement, but it
Again, because arabic seems to be vanished in my first posting, I dont know why.
Thanks Khaled,
the Naskh-Style is not an absolute requirement, but it is very well
known and very common (at least for muslims in germany) - and it is very
nice, of course, this is an question of flavor.
I know
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 08:49:40PM +0100, H. Özoguz wrote:
http://amirifont.org/
/ - and more hard to find such a find in this style (Uthmanic).
/
There is no such a style, it is just a simplified (dumbed down) Naskh
style used only in one single Mushaf. Why is that a requirement?
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 08:53:00PM +0100, H. Özoguz wrote:
Again, because arabic seems to be vanished in my first posting, I dont know
why.
Thanks Khaled,
the Naskh-Style is not an absolute requirement, but it is very well
known and very common (at least for muslims in germany) - and
It is my believe that Unicode has the wrong properties for Arabic
standalone Hamza; in short you should just type a regular Hamza in the
middle of the word and it will get positioned correctly. Placing a
combining Hamza over a Tatweel to “fake” it is wrong IMO. So in Amiri
you just type
On 2013-11-18 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013–06–03 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
in fresh MkIV I use the following commands for building ToC, but I
have no idea how to align the label (roman numeral) to the right.
I am almost there, but things get complicated when chapters are
combined with
Hi Huseyin,
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:18 PM, H. Özoguz h.oezo...@mmnetz.de wrote:
If I put the same arabic into CorelDraw, it prints a nice Unicode-Symbol for
the number - see the JPG I have attached here, screenshot from CorelDraw,
but ConTeXt ignores the brackets and prints just a verys
Hi Ondra,
thanks for your help.
Apparently, replacing a number enclosed in ornate parentheses (U+FD3E
and U+FD3F) with a number in the end of ayah ornament is a specialty
of the UthmanicHafs font. If I input the digit (e.g. U+0662) and then
the special non-printable end of ayah character
Thanks, that works fine:
\definefont[arabicamiri][file:amiri-regular.ttf*arabic at 15pt]
\definefont[arabicuth][file:UthmanicHafs1Ver09.ttf*arabic at 17pt]
\def\eoa#1{#1\char06DD}
\starttext
\setupalign[r2l]
\arabicuth لأَفَبِهَـٰذَا ٱلْحَدِيثِ أَنتُم مُّدْهِنُونَ ﴿٨١﴾\eoa
\stoptext
Now I
31 matches
Mail list logo
