On 1/10/2017 9:41 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/09/2017 01:15 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/9/2017 12:39 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
is there a way to keep interaction in the resulting PDF document when
adding the whole document with \insertpages, or only some pages with
On 1/11/2017 10:11 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
Dear list,
why are italic corrections in the MWE below not inserted according to the rules
stated in the new font manual? See comments in the code for details. I can
reproduce the issue with TL2016 and latest beta.
you can test with
local
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 20:31:20 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 1/17/2017 8:13 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
>> Bump
>>
>> On 01/09/2017 01:49 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
>>> Dear list,
>>>
>>> I cannot seem to find the documentation for the parameters which you can
>>> set in the first line of
Hi,
My question seems to raise no interest, or at least answer :)
To illustrate my problem. My publication list display "[1]", "[2]", etc.
See: http://imgur.com/wVGqNPq
But my text display [Kup03a] for example
See: http://imgur.com/TEsiynq
How can I adjust the publication list to display
On 1/18/2017 1:58 PM, Christoph Reller wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 20:31:20 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/17/2017 8:13 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
Bump
On 01/09/2017 01:49 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
Dear list,
I cannot seem to find the documentation for the parameters which you can
On 18/01/2017 16:53, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Nicola,
Indeed there is a recent bug, reported by Mikael Sundqvist a few days ago, and
Hans is aware of this.
Hans said in the next release of ConTeXt beta the issue will be fixed.
Sorry, I hadn't noticed the other thread. I'll wait for the next
Hi Nicola,
In fact, if you are in a hurry and don’t use subtle things introduced since May
2016, you can use the stable version of ConTeXt from TeXLive 2016 (the bug
noticed by Mikael, and you, is absent from that version of ConTeXt).
Best regards: OK
> On 18 Jan 2017, at 17:26, Nicola
On 18/01/2017 17:53, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Nicola,
In fact, if you are in a hurry and don’t use subtle things
introduced since May 2016, you can use the stable version of ConTeXt from
TeXLive
2016 (the bug noticed by Mikael, and you, is absent from that version of
ConTeXt).
Thanks,
On 1/18/2017 4:29 PM, DesdeChaves wrote:
Dear sirs,
Is there a way to compare, in TeX environment, a value returned from a
lua function with a TeX variable?
Please see this code:
\def\aleatorioValue{
\startlua
local nu = math.random(1,10);
if nu<5 return 1 else return 0 end
\stoplua
}
On 1/18/2017 6:23 PM, Nicola wrote:
On 18/01/2017 17:53, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Nicola,
In fact, if you are in a hurry and don’t use subtle things
introduced since May 2016, you can use the stable version of ConTeXt
from TeXLive
2016 (the bug noticed by Mikael, and you, is absent from that
Hi Nicola,
Indeed there is a recent bug, reported by Mikael Sundqvist a few days ago, and
Hans is aware of this.
Hans said in the next release of ConTeXt beta the issue will be fixed.
Best regards: OK
> On 18 Jan 2017, at 16:00, Nicola wrote:
>
> Hello,
> has
Hello,
has something been changed in the last few months in the vertical
spacing of displayed formulas, frames or other environments?
I am re-typesetting some presentations using the latest beta and the
content of slides (especially those containing formulas) now tends to
flow to the next page,
Dear sirs,
Is there a way to compare, in TeX environment, a value returned from a lua
function with a TeX variable?
Please see this code:
\def\aleatorioValue{
\startlua
local nu = math.random(1,10);
if nu<5 return 1 else return 0 end
\stoplua
}
\edef\controlValue{1}
\edef\inferior{Number too
Hi Hans,
Thanks for your attention which fixed most of the difficulties with vertical
distances around math formulas.
However, after typesetting a long document, I noticed that there are still some
incorrect behaviours. The following minimal example, extracted from that long
document, shows
14 matches
Mail list logo