[NTG-context] Announcing a new script: TeXVersion

2004-08-25 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Hi, Sometimes I find it quite hard to discover what version of TeX + ConTeXt I am actually running. As an aid in debugging problems, I have created a Perl script that attempts to collect all relevant version information and prints it to the screen in an organized manner. Running it will

Re: [NTG-context] Announcing a new script: TeXVersion

2004-08-25 Thread Maurice Diamantini
Le 25 août 04, à 09:28, Taco Hoekwater a écrit : Running it will generate output like this: TeXVersion 0.1 / Taco Hoekwater 2004 texexec : TeXExec 4.4 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2004 texutil : TeXUtil 7.4 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1992-2002

[NTG-context] new ConTeXt versions

2004-08-25 Thread Thomas A . Schmitz
I just used Taco's new script (which I find wonderful, thanks so much!), and this made me realize a problem: the latest version of ConTeXt should have updated texexec to version 4.4 -- and it did, sort of. When I checked, it still said texexec : TeXExec 4.0 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2004. I

Re: [NTG-context] new ConTeXt versions

2004-08-25 Thread Eckhart Guthöhrlein
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:00:03PM +0200, Thomas A.Schmitz wrote: I just used Taco's new script (which I find wonderful, thanks so much!), and this made me realize a problem: the latest version of ConTeXt should have updated texexec to version 4.4 -- and it did, sort of. When I checked, it

[NTG-context] [Fwd: how to typeset Russian font in ConTeXt]

2004-08-25 Thread Hans Hagen
-- - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com

Re: [NTG-context] new ConTeXt versions

2004-08-25 Thread Hans Hagen
Thomas A.Schmitz wrote: I just used Taco's new script (which I find wonderful, thanks so much!), and this made me realize a problem: the latest version of ConTeXt should have updated texexec to version 4.4 -- and it did, sort of. When I checked, it still said texexec : TeXExec 4.0 - ConTeXt /

[NTG-context] Re: Footnotes in margin? (HELP!)

2004-08-25 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Hans, I don't know what crazy stuff Idris is using this footnotes for, but for my case it went absolutely horrible: Almost every page gets half empty!! It looks like the footnotes are just moved to the margin - leaving empty space, without the body text comes flush bottom again. I'm sure my

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Footnotes in margin? (HELP!)

2004-08-25 Thread Willi Egger
Hi Steffen, I tried your code and indeed I am getting also half-empty pages. I tried then the following: I replaced the dorecurse by \input knuth \mynote{knuth} \blank[1cm] \input ward \mynote{ward} \blank[1cm] \input knuth \mynote{knuth} \blank[1cm] \input ward \mynote{ward} \blank[1cm] \input

[NTG-context] Re: Footnotes in margin? (HELP!)

2004-08-25 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Hi Willi, that's also what I experienced: the code works with very small footnotes. I am working now on a thesis with kind of normal equipment: Some hundred pages, about 900 footnotes with lots of them quite long (seems to be normal nowadays for art-historians). So what to do? Steffen

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Re: Re: nath catcode issues

2004-08-25 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Sunday, August 8, 2004 Nikolai Weibull wrote: * Giuseppe Bilotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Aug 08, 2004 16:30]: ConTeXt ver: 2004.6.30 fmt: 2004.7.27 int: english mes: english Me too. [Example] Argh, that doesn't happen here... This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.20a-rc4-2.1 (MiKTeX 2.4)

Re: [NTG-context] nath problems and patches

2004-08-25 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Friday, August 13, 2004 Christopher Creutzig wrote: Giuseppe, you may or may not know about these problems already, so I decided to simply send them all. I'm using t-nath.tex 2003.12.08, updated five minutes ago from www.tug.org, ConTeXt 2004.6.26, and pdfeTeX 3.14159-1.10b-2.1 (Web2C

[NTG-context] Re: Some proposed improvements for t-amsl.tex.

2004-08-25 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Hello Moses (uh ... I hope that's the name and Brooks is the surname ... :)), thank you very much for your email; it's very detailed and useful, which is why I've only replied this late (well, also because vacation-style RL popped in, but I digress :)) I'll address a couple of points replying