[NTG-context] $TEXINPUT worries

2010-09-24 Thread Rolf Marvin Bøe Lindgren
It seems that the commands context and texexec cause ConTeXt to look in different paths. I haven't been able to see any patterh here. context sees some files that texexec doesn't, and vice versa. I currently use TeXLive 2010, but TeXLive 2009 displays the same behavior. Any and all

Re: [NTG-context] $TEXINPUT worries

2010-09-24 Thread Peter Münster
On Fri, Sep 24 2010, Rolf Marvin Bøe Lindgren wrote: It seems that the commands context and texexec cause ConTeXt to look in different paths. Hello, Are you talking about $TEXINPUTS ? Then you should unset this variable. See also:

Re: [NTG-context] New beta 2010-09-22 and xits fonts

2010-09-24 Thread Hans Hagen
On 22-9-2010 2:06, Otared Kavian wrote: It seems that the xits fonts does not work anymore with the recent versions (at least since 2010-09-18): the integral signs are not properly scaled and the square root behaves strangely: minimal example below (and the resulting PDF, with ConTeXt ver:

[NTG-context] change affecting MPgraphic?

2010-09-24 Thread Marko Schütz Schmuck
Dear All, I only very recently updated from ConTeXt ver: 2005.01.31 to ConTeXt ver: 2009.08.19 17:10 MKII Previously, using env-assign.tex as described in a 2006 PracTeX article worked fine. With the new version the drop shadow box is not rendered. This is the version of env-assign.tex

Re: [NTG-context] picture- and formula-references broken with current beta

2010-09-24 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Wednesday 22 September 2010 12:40:35 Hans Hagen wrote: On 22-9-2010 11:50, Andreas Harder wrote: Hi all, can someone confirm that picture- and formula-references are broken with the current beta. Here is a test file: \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] picture- and formula-references broken with current beta

2010-09-24 Thread Hans Hagen
On 24-9-2010 3:30, Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Wednesday 22 September 2010 12:40:35 Hans Hagen wrote: On 22-9-2010 11:50, Andreas Harder wrote: Hi all, can someone confirm that picture- and formula-references are broken with the current beta. Here is a test file: \starttext

[NTG-context] Superscript in \date

2010-09-24 Thread Florian Wobbe
Dear all, I tried to change the output format of \date so that the day includes the letter suffixes as superscript. \definefontfeature[sups][sups=yes,script=latn] \usetypescript[antykwa-torunska] \setupbodyfont[antykwa,12pt] \starttext \date[][day,{\setff{sups}th},~,month,year]

Re: [NTG-context] Superscript in \date

2010-09-24 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Florian Wobbe wrote: 57{\setff{sups}th} or \date[][day,$^{\mr th}$,~,month,year] Don't know about \setff, but using \high{th} is better than going to math mode. Aditya ___ If your question

Re: [NTG-context] change affecting MPgraphic?

2010-09-24 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Marko Schütz Schmuck wrote: Dear All, I only very recently updated from ConTeXt ver: 2005.01.31 to ConTeXt ver: 2009.08.19 17:10 MKII Previously, using env-assign.tex as described in a 2006 PracTeX article worked fine. With the new version the drop shadow box is not

Re: [NTG-context] Superscript in \date

2010-09-24 Thread Florian Wobbe
Well, and I didn't know about \high - thanks for pointing out. My aim was actually to make use of the superscript font feature of Antykwa. Florian On Sep 24, 2010, at 17:18 , Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Florian Wobbe wrote: 57{\setff{sups}th} or \date[][day,$^{\mr

Re: [NTG-context] new beta (index)

2010-09-24 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 22.09.2010 um 16:52 schrieb Hans Hagen: On 22-9-2010 3:22, Alan BRASLAU wrote: Nice, but something is broken (of course, my minimal examples work, but not my 700+ page test file!): (thanks to Taco, I now understand the luatex error message) hm, so some word in the index is triggering

[NTG-context] producing offprints

2010-09-24 Thread Bowen Alan C.
Second try. I use a structure like \startproduct prd_JournalVolume \component c_A.tex \component c_B.tex \stopproduct to produce a single PDF file for the volume of a journal. Is there a way in MKII to adapt this so that instead of a single JournalVolume.pdf, I get c_A.pdf