Wolfgang,
Can you explain to us why it should be preferable for ConTeXt users to
employ \frac12 rather than the native TeX construction {1\over 2}?
I understand that the macro \frac does some additional trickery but the
two constructions should *always* yield identical results (when
keyed-in
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 12/22/2015 5:36 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:
>
> \starttikzpicture
> %\startaxis[legend entries={Cos,Sin2,Sin},reverse legend]
> \cldcommand{startaxis{["legend entries"] =
So it it a TeX programming limitation.
The risk of leading to an exponential number of branches is addressed
by Knuth at the beginning of Chapter 17 of the TeXbook (p. 139):
"Mathematicians tend to \quote{overuse} \over when they first begin to
typeset their own work on a system like \TEX." ...
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
Wolfgang,
Can you explain to us why it should be preferable for ConTeXt users to
employ \frac12 rather than the native TeX construction {1\over 2}?
I understand that the macro \frac does some additional trickery but the
two constructions should *always*
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:
\starttikzpicture
%\startaxis[legend entries={Cos,Sin2,Sin},reverse legend]
\cldcommand{startaxis{["legend entries"] = "{Cos,Sin2,Sin}", "reverse
legend"}}
This is not valid lua. On a lua prompt, try
t = {["legend
On 12/22/2015 5:36 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:
\starttikzpicture
%\startaxis[legend entries={Cos,Sin2,Sin},reverse legend]
\cldcommand{startaxis{["legend entries"] = "{Cos,Sin2,Sin}", "reverse
legend"}}
This is not
