Re: [NTG-context] Large space between mode blocks

On 5/18/2017 6:13 PM, Jan Willem Flamma wrote: Dear list members, Another mode related question: When combining modes, a rather large double space appears between two mode blocks (i.e. where the first mode stops and the second mode begins) In the MWE below are 3 cases. The large space is not

[NTG-context] Large space between mode blocks

Dear list members, Another mode related question: When combining modes, a rather large double space appears between two mode blocks (i.e. where the first mode stops and the second mode begins) In the MWE below are 3 cases. The large space is not present in the 3rd case Is this intended

Re: [NTG-context] \overline and \overbar

Dear, I am sorry to bring up \overline, \overbar, and \bar issue. Here is a sample file and I attached two pdf files which were compiled using two different version of ConTeXt. Under the LuaTeX v. 1.03, ConTeXt ver: 2017.03.02 22:23 MKIV beta, the output overlineB.pdf is OK, but under the

Re: [NTG-context] \doifmode error with question blocks

On 5/18/2017 1:48 PM, Jan Willem Flamma wrote: Dear list members If using modes to show or hide certain part of the text. In the MWE below the part between the startmode[test] .. stopmode works jus fine. When using the \doifmode construction an error is produced on the position of the

[NTG-context] \doifmode error with question blocks

Dear list members If using modes to show or hide certain part of the text. In the MWE below the part between the startmode[test] .. stopmode works jus fine. When using the \doifmode construction an error is produced on the position of the closing curly bracket. I prefer to use \doifmode

Re: [NTG-context] (re)defining command with options

> See also http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Commands_with_optional_arguments > How could I possibly have overlooked this?! Thanks a lot! Florian Grammel Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

Den 18 maj 2017 10:13 fm skrev "Otared Kavian" : Hi Hans, Thanks for your explanations. When using constructions such as $f’’_2(x)$, I will adapt my input in order to get what seems correct. Best regards: OK > On 17 May 2017, at 17:17, Hans Hagen wrote: > >

Re: [NTG-context] Spurious vertical space above figure

Am 18.05.2017 um 01:18 schrieb Henri Menke: Motivated by this question on TeX.SX https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/370292 I found out that in a full-page figure there is a spurious vertical space of .5\baselineskip above the figure. I was not able to find out where it comes from. Is

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

Hi Hans, Thanks for your explanations. When using constructions such as $f’’_2(x)$, I will adapt my input in order to get what seems correct. Best regards: OK > On 17 May 2017, at 17:17, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 5/17/2017 8:35 AM, Otared Kavian wrote: >> Hi Hans, >> >>