On 10/30/2018 13:58, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 10/30/2018 5:32 PM, Rik Kabel wrote:
In one 300-page book, this hits a few times (off-course,
oft-repeated,...). Not the worst problem, but clearly a regression.
i think i know what happens ... fwiw, it's not related to the engine
(nothing really
On 10/30/2018 5:32 PM, Rik Kabel wrote:
In one 300-page book, this hits a few times (off-course,
oft-repeated,...). Not the worst problem, but clearly a regression.
i think i know what happens ... fwiw, it's not related to the engine
(nothing really changes there nor will change but 1.07
\setuppapersize[A7]
\starttext
fi fl ffi ffl
fi-fi fl-fl ffi-ffi ffl-ffl
\setbreakpoints[compound]
fi-fi fl-fl ffi-ffi ffl-ffl
\stoptext
Wolfgang
Rik Kabel schrieb am 30.10.18 um 17:32:
This was reported on the LuaLatex list yesterday, and I extended the
example to include ConTeXt
This was reported on the LuaLatex list yesterday, and I extended the
example to include ConTeXt compounds. From my test folder:
%% No ligatures before dashes! Reported as: “ligatures before
%% dashes not working with LuaLaTeX 1.07.0” on comp.tex.luatex,
%% 2018-10-29 by Toni
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 10:05:15AM +0200, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> πρᾶ-γμα πρά-γμα-τος
>
> As far as I know, two consonants in ancient Greek aren’t hyphenated,
> when they may begin a word.
>
> Γν may be the beginning of word in Greek (such as γνῶσις), but even LSJ
> has no word that begins
>
> So, \offinterlineskip disables the interline skip completely?
Indeed, it is just plain TeX. In order to inhibit the interline glue in front
of the next line only, use \nointerlineskip.
dr. Hans van der Meer
> On 30 Oct 2018, at 14:08, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>
> Am 2018-10-29 um
Am 2018-10-29 um 16:47 schrieb Herbert Voss :
> Am 29.10.18 um 16:13 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
>
>> But it doesn’t help with my labels.
>
> you have a
>
> \setupinterlinespace[2ex]
>
> so \offinterlinespace has no real meaning here. Try it without and
>
> \setupinterlinespace[0.1pt]
>
>>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:18 AM Ulrike Fischer wrote:
> According to the xelatex output in the following example both
> variants are not correct. What would be needed would be the first
> two glyphs from variant 1 (knd2 script) and the third from variant 2
> (knda script).
>
>
dunno, but to
According to the xelatex output in the following example both
variants are not correct. What would be needed would be the first
two glyphs from variant 1 (knd2 script) and the third from variant 2
(knda script).
Pictures comparing the output can be found at
