Re: [NTG-context] Placing extra bookmarks?

> On 2 Dec 2020, at 18:42, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 12/2/2020 12:10 AM, Bruce Horrocks wrote: >> On 1 Dec 2020, at 16:37, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: >>> Am 01.12.2020 um 15:36 schrieb Bruce Horrocks : I have \placebookmarks[chapter] in my doc and all is fine except that I'd

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

Oh, so it does. That doesn't look good. On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 2:21 PM Rik Kabel wrote: > > On 12/2/2020 13:59, T. Kurt Bond wrote: > > Interesting. > > Here is a an example that sort of works, Variant 1: > > \definefontfamily[english] [rm] [ebgaramond] [features={default, dlig=no}] >

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

On 12/2/2020 13:34, Hans Hagen wrote: On 12/2/2020 5:54 PM, Joey McCollum wrote: If you're using Octavio Pardo's version of EB Garamond (https://github.com/octaviopardo/EBGaramond12 ), then these ligatures are covered (along with the Th ligature)

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

On 12/2/2020 13:59, T. Kurt Bond wrote: Interesting. Here is a an example that sort of works, Variant 1: \definefontfamily[english] [rm] [ebgaramond] [features={default, dlig=no}] \setupbodyfont[english,10pt] \starttext Variant 1: Does this look like EBGaramond?

Re: [NTG-context] ntg-context Digest, Vol 198, Issue 8

Andres Conrado Montoya schrieb am 02.12.2020 um 20:05: You are naming your font "english". If you call "ebgaramond" it will always take the default ebgaramond features. Just call your font with the name you gave it. \definefontfamily[english] [rm] [ebgaramond] [features={dlig=no}] Pass only

Re: [NTG-context] ntg-context Digest, Vol 198, Issue 8

You are naming your font "english". If you call "ebgaramond" it will always take the default ebgaramond features. Just call your font with the name you gave it. \definefontfamily[english] [rm] [ebgaramond] [features={dlig=no}] \setupbodyfont[english,10pt] \starttext ct st \stoptext -- Andrés

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

I agree, this solution does seem cleaner to me. Thanks! On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 1:23 PM Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > On 12/2/20 6:56 PM, T. Kurt Bond wrote: > > Ah, ok. > > > > Here is a minimal NONWORKING example: the resulting PDF shows the ct and > > st ligatures. What commands should I use to

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

Interesting. Here is a an example that sort of works, Variant 1: \definefontfamily[english] [rm] [ebgaramond] [features={default, dlig=no}] \setupbodyfont[english,10pt] \starttext Variant 1: Does this look like EBGaramond? fi fl ffi ffl ct st \stoptext However, it turns of *all* the

Re: [NTG-context] Placing extra bookmarks?

On 12/2/2020 12:10 AM, Bruce Horrocks wrote: On 1 Dec 2020, at 16:37, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: Am 01.12.2020 um 15:36 schrieb Bruce Horrocks : I have \placebookmarks[chapter] in my doc and all is fine except that I'd like to force an extra bookmark at the top of the list that jumps to

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

On 12/2/2020 5:54 PM, Joey McCollum wrote: If you're using Octavio Pardo's version of EB Garamond (https://github.com/octaviopardo/EBGaramond12 ), then these ligatures are covered (along with the Th ligature) by the "dlig" (discretionary

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

That did the trick, thanks! Should I put that on the wiki? Where should it go? On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 1:07 PM Joey McCollum wrote: > You'll need to use the alias for the font family, as follows: > > \definefontfamily[english] [rm] [ebgaramond] [features={default, hlig=no}] > >

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

On 12/2/20 6:56 PM, T. Kurt Bond wrote: > Ah, ok. > > Here is a minimal NONWORKING example: the resulting PDF shows the ct and > st ligatures.  What commands should I use to turn them off? Hi Kurt, here you have the sample that should work: %~ \definefontfamily[ebgaramond] [rm] [ebgaramond]

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

T. Kurt Bond schrieb am 02.12.2020 um 18:56: Ah, ok. Here is a minimal NONWORKING example: the resulting PDF shows the ct and st ligatures.  What commands should I use to turn them off? \definefontfamily[english] [rm] [ebgaramond] [features={default,dlig=no}] \setupbodyfont[ebgaramond,10pt]

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

Sorry, there was a typo. Use this: \definefontfamily[english] [rm] [ebgaramond] [features={default, dlig=no}] \setupbodyfont[english,10pt] \starttext ct st \stoptext On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 1:05 PM Joey McCollum wrote: > You'll need to use the alias for the font family, as follows: > >

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

You'll need to use the alias for the font family, as follows: \definefontfamily[english] [rm] [ebgaramond] [features={default, hlig=no}] \setupbodyfont[english,10pt] \starttext ct st \stoptext On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:56 PM T. Kurt Bond wrote: > Ah, ok. > > Here is a minimal NONWORKING

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

Ah, ok. Here is a minimal NONWORKING example: the resulting PDF shows the ct and st ligatures. What commands should I use to turn them off? \definefontfamily[english] [rm] [ebgaramond] [features={default,dlig=no}] \setupbodyfont[ebgaramond,10pt] \starttext ct st \stoptext On Wed, Dec 2, 2020

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

On 12/2/2020 6:14 PM, T. Kurt Bond wrote: It does help.  Thanks. But how do I turn that font feature off in ConTeXt? You forget to add a MWE ... Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

The wiki page on featuresets (https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Featuresets) offers a more comprehensive treatment. On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:29 PM Joey McCollum wrote: > I think it would look something like > > \definefontfamily[english] [rm] [EB Garamond] [features={default,dlig=no}] > > On Wed,

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

I think it would look something like \definefontfamily[english] [rm] [EB Garamond] [features={default,dlig=no}] On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:14 PM T. Kurt Bond wrote: > It does help. Thanks. > > But how do I turn that font feature off in ConTeXt? > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 11:55 AM Joey McCollum

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

It does help. Thanks. But how do I turn that font feature off in ConTeXt? On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 11:55 AM Joey McCollum wrote: > If you're using Octavio Pardo's version of EB Garamond ( > https://github.com/octaviopardo/EBGaramond12), then these ligatures are > covered (along with the Th

Re: [NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

If you're using Octavio Pardo's version of EB Garamond ( https://github.com/octaviopardo/EBGaramond12), then these ligatures are covered (along with the Th ligature) by the "dlig" (discretionary ligatures) feature, so you'll need to disable that. Unfortunately, this will also disable the Th

[NTG-context] How do I get rid of the ct and st ligatures in EBGaramond?

Searches didn't reveal the answer. -- T. Kurt Bond, tkurtb...@gmail.com, https://tkurtbond.github.io ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist :

Re: [NTG-context] Using ConTeXt-LMTX for modern Mathematically-Literate-Programming 2/2

On 12/2/2020 11:43 AM, Stephen Gaito wrote: Again, to my knowledge, Lua v5.4 has only one implementation (though this implementation *can* be compiled for a very wide range of CPU's). Lua has not many demands ... it can even run on tiny cpu's. It's all rather plain C code. (And in luametatex

Re: [NTG-context] Using ConTeXt-LMTX for modern Mathematically-Literate-Programming 1/2

On 12/2/2020 10:40 AM, Stephen Gaito wrote: Many thanks for your swift and helpful comments. After some *very crude* tests using the `luametatex` and `luametafun` documents, I find that while I *can* stop effective processing at various points in the LuaMetaTeX pipeline, the time difference

Re: [NTG-context] Using ConTeXt-LMTX for modern Mathematically-Literate-Programming 2/2

Hans, Many thanks for your comments... see below. On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:31:55 +0100 Hans Hagen wrote: > On 11/30/2020 10:51 AM, Stephen Gaito wrote: > > Hello (again), > > > > This email is further to my previous "Using ConTeXt-LMTX for modern > > Mathematically-Literate-Programming 1/2"

Re: [NTG-context] Using ConTeXt-LMTX for modern Mathematically-Literate-Programming 1/2

Hans, Many thanks for your swift and helpful comments. After some *very crude* tests using the `luametatex` and `luametafun` documents, I find that while I *can* stop effective processing at various points in the LuaMetaTeX pipeline, the time difference overall is not really significant enough

Re: [NTG-context] Installing VSCode extension?

On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 22:07:53 +0200 Mikael Sundqvist wrote: > * Since January, the editor supports a global tasks.json file (if I > understood > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41046494/making-global-tasks-in-vs-code > correctly). Are those extensions only for VSCode or they should work with